All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Dave Anderson <anderson@redhat.com>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.cz>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Wang Long <long.wanglong@huawei.com>,
	peifeiyue@huawei.com, dzickus@redhat.com, morgan.wang@huawei.com,
	sasha.levin@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:06:16 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150601130616.GE20288@quack.suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150529135045.09d87c7ab98bf26dec95c8b3@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri 29-05-15 13:50:45, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 14:46:23 +0200 Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.cz> wrote:
> 
> > The main source of deadlocks caused by printk() in NMI context has been
> > solved by the commit a9edc88093287 ("x86/nmi: Perform a safe NMI stack
> > trace on all CPUs").
> > 
> > But there are still few warnings printed in the NMI code that could
> > case a deadlock. For example, see the freeze discussed at
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/5/20/481
> 
> I'm not (yet) convinced that we want the entire patchset btw.  Do we
> really want to try to semi-support printk from NMI?  With a rather
> nasty set of hacks?
> 
> Why not just delete the offending printks?
  And what about WARN_ONs and BUG_ONs? Delete as well? Or just don't print
anything when we are in NMI? I agree that NMI is so problematic context
that restricting printk there makes some sence. OTOH propagating
information from NMI to user is useful as well so I'm somewhat undecided.

								Honza
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-01 13:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-25 12:46 [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 01/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:13   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 12:00     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 02/10] printk: Try harder to get logbuf_lock on NMI Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:14   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28  7:54     ` Jiri Kosina
2015-05-28 13:50     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-28 20:09       ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-29 10:56         ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:46           ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 03/10] printk: Move the deferred printk stuff Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 04/10] printk: Merge and flush NMI buffer predictably via IRQ work Petr Mladek
2015-05-27 23:14   ` Andrew Morton
2015-05-28 13:12     ` Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 05/10] printk: Try hard to print Oops message in NMI context Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 06/10] printk: Split delayed printing of warnings from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 07/10] printk: Split text formatting and analyze " Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 08/10] printk: Detect scheduler messages in vprintk_format_and_analyze() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 09/10] printk: Split text storing logic from vprintk_emit() Petr Mladek
2015-05-25 12:46 ` [PATCH 10/10] printk: Split console call " Petr Mladek
2015-05-29 20:50 ` [PATCH 00/10] printk: Avoid deadlock in NMI + vprintk_emit() cleanup Andrew Morton
2015-06-01 13:06   ` Jan Kara [this message]
2015-06-02  9:46     ` long.wanglong
2015-06-02  9:52       ` Jiri Kosina

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150601130616.GE20288@quack.suse.cz \
    --to=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anderson@redhat.com \
    --cc=dzickus@redhat.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=kay@vrfy.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=long.wanglong@huawei.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.cz \
    --cc=morgan.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peifeiyue@huawei.com \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.cz \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.