From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id A3430E00A01; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:33:38 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, high * trust * [198.47.26.152 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] Received: from comal.ext.ti.com (comal.ext.ti.com [198.47.26.152]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2191E00547 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 06:33:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dlelxv90.itg.ti.com ([172.17.2.17]) by comal.ext.ti.com (8.13.7/8.13.7) with ESMTP id t51DXYr7000507 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:33:34 -0500 Received: from DLEE70.ent.ti.com (dlee70.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.113]) by dlelxv90.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t51DXYs4007732 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:33:34 -0500 Received: from dflp32.itg.ti.com (10.64.6.15) by DLEE70.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.224.2; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:33:33 -0500 Received: from localhost (ileax41-snat.itg.ti.com [10.172.224.153]) by dflp32.itg.ti.com (8.14.3/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t51DXX7g011514; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 08:33:33 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 09:33:33 -0400 From: Denys Dmytriyenko To: Jacob Stiffler Message-ID: <20150601133333.GJ16418@edge> References: <1431094194-11852-1-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <1431094194-11852-2-git-send-email-j-stiffler@ti.com> <22A42254-B630-4E50-BB82-A52F1FA2CD84@gmail.com> <554CEFB6.3070708@ti.com> <20150519201102.GD31845@edge> <555C621A.6090704@ti.com> <20150522181216.GD8903@edge> <55674045.9080509@ti.com> <20150529193747.GP16418@edge> <556C559D.7070601@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <556C559D.7070601@ti.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] ti-xdais: Add version 7.24.00.04 X-BeenThere: meta-ti@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-ti layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:33:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 08:52:45AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > > > On 5/29/2015 3:37 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >> > >>On 5/22/2015 2:12 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>On Wed, May 20, 2015 at 06:29:46AM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>>>On 5/19/2015 4:11 PM, Denys Dmytriyenko wrote: > >>>>>On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:17:42PM -0400, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>>>>>I was following the precedent set by existing RTOS packages (See > >>>>>>recipes-ti/xdais/ti-xdais_6.26.01.03.bb). > >>>>>> > >>>>>>These RTOS packages are build only dependencies, and they do not get > >>>>>>installed into the target filesystem. They are primarily used for > >>>>>>building firmware. > >>>>>Should they be "-native" then? > >>>>> > >>>>I suppose they should be, but this is how is was done before. > >>>> > >>>>If you look at recipes-ti/includes/ti-paths.inc, you'll see that all > >>>>paths point into STAGING_DIR_TARGET > >>>Ok, we may end up doing this on the target at some point. > >>>Can we simply FILES_${PN} += "*" to pick up everything installed and shove it > >>>into the package? That way we won't need INSANE_SKIP and the build deps can be > >>>used on the target in the future... > >>> > >>Adding all of these files to the ${PN} package causes them to be > >>pulled into the filesystem. Should these instead go into the > >>${PN}-dev package (they are purely development files), and then > >>ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1"? > >Actually, that's a good idea. Should we modify other recipes similarly, when > >they only provide build dependencies for DSP? > > > > It seems this would make the most sense. > > Should I submit patches for the recently updated packages which > would be effected? They are the following: > * ti-sysbios > * ti-xdais Let me push what I already have to not delay it any longer. Please send a followup patch to update FILES_${PN}-dev - could be a single patch across recipes. Thanks. > I'm not sure about ti-xdctools since this includes xdc and other utilities. > > >>>>>>On 5/8/2015 12:23 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > >>>>>>>>On May 8, 2015, at 7:09 AM, Jacob Stiffler wrote: > >>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>+INSANE_SKIP_${PN} = "installed-vs-shipped" > >>>>>>>can this be fixed instead ? > >>>>>>-- > >>>>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>>>meta-ti mailing list > >>>>>>meta-ti@yoctoproject.org > >>>>>>https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/meta-ti >