All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Philippe Coval <philippe.coval@open.eurogiciel.org>,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Dmitry Tunin <hanipouspilot@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2015 20:27:50 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150603032750.GA49670@vmdeb7> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150602160723.3b519d63@canb.auug.org.au>

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 04:07:23PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Darren,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the drivers-x86 tree got a conflict in
> drivers/platform/x86/ideapad-laptop.c between commit 9b071a43553d
> ("ideapad_laptop: Add Lenovo G40-30 to devices without radio switch")
> from Linus' tree and commit 4fa9dabcffc8 ("ideapad_laptop: Lenovo
> G50-30 fix rfkill reports wireless blocked") from the drivers-x86 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary (no action
> is required).

Thanks for the heads' up. This happens because my -next branch is based on *-rc1
as I think was recommended at the last kernel summit. Since rc1 I sent Linus the
G50-30, but by rc6 I didn't feel good about sending the similar G50-30 fix, so
that is in my rc1 branch.

I am happy to rebase my -next on rc6 to avoid the conflict, but I believe the
rebase is considered poor practice.

You said no action required, but if there is something I can do to avoid this
kind of manual effort on your part (and a manual merge by Linus in the upcoming
merge window), I'm happy to update my process to accommodate.

Thanks,

-- 
Darren Hart
Intel Open Source Technology Center

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-03  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-02  6:07 linux-next: manual merge of the drivers-x86 tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2015-06-03  3:27 ` Darren Hart [this message]
2015-06-03  4:04   ` Stephen Rothwell
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-09  6:24 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14  3:32 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14  3:42 ` Kurt Borja
2024-08-26  3:44 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-08  2:34 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-08  2:19 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-01  3:14 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-08  1:57 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-02  2:30 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-29  3:29 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-29  9:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2016-01-15  1:56 Stephen Rothwell
2012-05-31  2:06 Stephen Rothwell
2011-04-08  5:26 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-24  2:48 Stephen Rothwell
2011-03-24  2:52 ` Matthew Garrett
2010-08-25  1:22 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150603032750.GA49670@vmdeb7 \
    --to=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=hanipouspilot@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=philippe.coval@open.eurogiciel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.