From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: optimize phys_page_set_level
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2015 18:14:47 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150603181331-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1432214398-14990-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com>
On Thu, May 21, 2015 at 03:19:58PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> phys_page_set_level is writing zeroes to a struct that has just been
> filled in by phys_map_node_alloc. Instead, tell phys_map_node_alloc
> whether to fill in the page "as a leaf" or "as a non-leaf".
>
> memcpy is faster than struct assignment, which copies each bitfield
> individually. Arguably a compiler bug, but memcpy is super-special
> cased anyway so what could go wrong?
>
> This cuts the cost of phys_page_set_level from 25% to 5% when
> booting qboot.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This patch might also be faster for another reason:
it skips an extra loop over L2 in the leaf case.
Reviewed-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> ---
> exec.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/exec.c b/exec.c
> index e19ab22..fc8d05d 100644
> --- a/exec.c
> +++ b/exec.c
> @@ -173,17 +173,22 @@ static void phys_map_node_reserve(PhysPageMap *map, unsigned nodes)
> }
> }
>
> -static uint32_t phys_map_node_alloc(PhysPageMap *map)
> +static uint32_t phys_map_node_alloc(PhysPageMap *map, bool leaf)
> {
> unsigned i;
> uint32_t ret;
> + PhysPageEntry e;
> + PhysPageEntry *p;
>
> ret = map->nodes_nb++;
> + p = map->nodes[ret];
> assert(ret != PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL);
> assert(ret != map->nodes_nb_alloc);
> +
> + e.skip = leaf ? 0 : 1;
> + e.ptr = leaf ? PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED : PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL;
> for (i = 0; i < P_L2_SIZE; ++i) {
> - map->nodes[ret][i].skip = 1;
> - map->nodes[ret][i].ptr = PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL;
> + memcpy(&p[i], &e, sizeof(e));
> }
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -193,21 +198,12 @@ static void phys_page_set_level(PhysPageMap *map, PhysPageEntry *lp,
> int level)
> {
> PhysPageEntry *p;
> - int i;
> hwaddr step = (hwaddr)1 << (level * P_L2_BITS);
>
> if (lp->skip && lp->ptr == PHYS_MAP_NODE_NIL) {
> - lp->ptr = phys_map_node_alloc(map);
> - p = map->nodes[lp->ptr];
> - if (level == 0) {
> - for (i = 0; i < P_L2_SIZE; i++) {
> - p[i].skip = 0;
> - p[i].ptr = PHYS_SECTION_UNASSIGNED;
> - }
> - }
> - } else {
> - p = map->nodes[lp->ptr];
> + lp->ptr = phys_map_node_alloc(map, level == 0);
> }
> + p = map->nodes[lp->ptr];
> lp = &p[(*index >> (level * P_L2_BITS)) & (P_L2_SIZE - 1)];
>
> while (*nb && lp < &p[P_L2_SIZE]) {
> --
> 2.4.1
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-03 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-21 13:19 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] exec: optimize phys_page_set_level Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-22 8:01 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-03 4:30 ` Richard Henderson
2015-06-03 7:03 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-03 16:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150603181331-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.