From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rafael Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com, paulus@samba.org,
shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com, prarit@redhat.com,
robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de, skannan@codeaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: register notifier from cs_init()
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 11:32:31 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150604060231.GD11325@linux> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <556FE44A.8080806@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 04-06-15, 11:08, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> I don't see why we need the check on policy->governor->initialized
> because we call cdata->init() and cdata->exit(), *only* when the first
> and last references to the governor are being made respectively
> (filtered by dbs_data->usage_count), which is precisely what the
> initialized flag checks. So passing policy->governor->initialized seems
> to be redundant? And this is the case for both gov_per_policy and otherwise.
That's the case only for !gov_per_policy.
In case of gov_per_policy, the same governor is used by multiple
policies but with different dbs_data objects. And in this case INIT
will be called only once for a dbs_data and so usage count will be max
1 at any time. But we want to register the notifiers for a governor
only once and so we need this extra check.
policy->governor->initialized is set to 1 when the governor is
initialized for the first policy. For all others it is incremented to
other values.
--
viresh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 6:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-03 10:27 [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: governor: Fix potential races Viresh Kumar
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 1/3] cpufreq: governor: register notifier from cs_init() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 5:38 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:02 ` Viresh Kumar [this message]
2015-06-04 7:33 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 2/3] cpufreq: governor: split cpufreq_governor_dbs() Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 10:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 10:17 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 11:13 ` [PATCH V2 " Viresh Kumar
2015-06-05 2:51 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-03 10:27 ` [PATCH 3/3] cpufreq: governor: Serialize governor callbacks Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 10:47 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 5:14 ` [PATCH 0/3] cpufreq: governor: Fix potential races Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:08 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:11 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 6:36 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 6:42 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 7:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-04 7:13 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-04 7:27 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-05 3:00 ` Viresh Kumar
2015-06-05 3:04 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-05 4:05 ` Preeti U Murthy
2015-06-15 23:48 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150604060231.GD11325@linux \
--to=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linaro-kernel@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulus@samba.org \
--cc=prarit@redhat.com \
--cc=preeti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=robert.schoene@tu-dresden.de \
--cc=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=skannan@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.