From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 11/12] ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:04:58 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150605100458.GD599@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150604094529.GB8346@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:45:30AM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> On Wed, Jun 03, 2015 at 04:16:39PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 02:52:29PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > Now that the common PSCI client code has been factored out to
> > > drivers/firmware, and made safe for 32-bit use, move the 32-bit ARM code
> > > over to it. This results in a moderate reduction of duplicated lines,
> > > and will prevent further duplication as the PSCI client code is updated
> > > for PSCI 1.0 and beyond.
> > >
> > > The two legacy platform users of the PSCI invocation code are updated to
> > > account for interface changes. In both cases the power state parameter
> > > is changed to an opaque u32 token in preparation for PSCI 1.0 power
> > > state changes.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> > > Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@linaro.org>
> > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
> > > Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
> > > Cc: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> > > ---
> > > arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > arch/arm/include/asm/psci.h | 23 ---
> > > arch/arm/kernel/Makefile | 2 +-
> > > arch/arm/kernel/psci.c | 299 --------------------------------------
> > > arch/arm/kernel/psci_smp.c | 29 +++-
> > > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 3 +-
> > > arch/arm/mach-highbank/highbank.c | 2 +-
> > > arch/arm/mach-highbank/pm.c | 8 +-
> > > drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle-calxeda.c | 7 +-
> > > 9 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 342 deletions(-)
> > > delete mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/psci.c
> >
> > Do you have any objections to the arch/arm changes in this patch?
> >
> > If not, could I please have your ack?
> >
> > As there are arm, arm64, and drivers changes in the series I was hoping
> > this could all go via arm-soc.
>
> If we don't hear from Russell by the end of today, I propose that we
> merge patches 1-8 in the arm64 tree (mostly fixes for PSCI). This series
> is blocking other developments like PSCI 1.0, so I really want to get
> parts of it merged in 4.2.
I've pushed the first 8 patches to my arm64/psci-rework branch [1]. I've
pushed the whole series with the tags provided today to psci/rework [2].
I tried a merge with the arm64 for-next/core branch locally, and got a
trivial conflict in smp.c against the changes in "arm64: Use common
outgoing-CPU-notification code". Hopefully that's easy to fix up
locally.
> BTW, can we skip patch 11 in this series and still allow
> drivers/firmware/psci.c only for arm64, with the aim of moving the arm32
> code later?
We could, though I would prefer to have the two unified from the
beginning.
Thanks,
Mark.
[1] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/psci-rework
[2] git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git psci/rework
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-05 10:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-26 13:52 [PATCHv3 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 01/12] arm/arm64: kvm: add missing PSCI include Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 02/12] arm64: smp_plat: add get_logical_index Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 03/12] arm64: smp: consistently use error codes Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 04/12] arm64: psci: remove unnecessary id indirection Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 05/12] arm64: psci: support unsigned return values Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 06/12] arm64: psci: account for Trusted OS instances Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 07/12] arm64: psci: kill psci_power_state Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 08/12] arm64: psci: remove ACPI coupling Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 20:18 ` Al Stone
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 09/12] arm64: psci: factor invocation code to drivers Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 10/12] drivers: psci: support native SMC{32,64} calls Mark Rutland
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 11/12] ARM: migrate to common PSCI client code Mark Rutland
2015-05-27 12:01 ` Ashwin Chaugule
2015-05-27 12:41 ` Mark Rutland
2015-05-27 16:46 ` Rob Herring
2015-05-27 17:17 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-03 15:19 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-03 15:16 ` Mark Rutland
2015-06-04 9:45 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-05 10:04 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-06-05 10:35 ` Catalin Marinas
2015-06-04 9:49 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-05-26 13:52 ` [PATCHv3 12/12] MAINTAINERS: add PSCI entry Mark Rutland
2015-05-27 8:08 ` [PATCHv3 00/12] arm/arm64: Unify PSCI client support Hanjun Guo
2015-05-27 12:23 ` Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150605100458.GD599@leverpostej \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.