Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the extcon tree

[Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>]

On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 07:18:38PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> This is now needed when the char-misc and battery trees are merged ...
> 
> On Mon, 25 May 2015 21:05:03 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > After merging the extcon tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > allyesconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c: In function 'axp288_charger_probe':
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:851:8: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'extcon_register_notifier'
> >   ret = extcon_register_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >         ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:240:12: note: expected 'enum extcon' but argument is of type 'struct notifier_block *'
> >  extern int extcon_register_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:851:8: error: too few arguments to function 'extcon_register_notifier'
> >   ret = extcon_register_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >         ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:240:12: note: declared here
> >  extern int extcon_register_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:912:2: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'extcon_unregister_notifier'
> >   extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >   ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:242:12: note: expected 'enum extcon' but argument is of type 'struct notifier_block *'
> >  extern int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:912:2: error: too few arguments to function 'extcon_unregister_notifier'
> >   extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >   ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:242:12: note: declared here
> >  extern int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c: In function 'axp288_charger_remove':
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:923:2: error: incompatible type for argument 2 of 'extcon_unregister_notifier'
> >   extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >   ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:242:12: note: expected 'enum extcon' but argument is of type 'struct notifier_block *'
> >  extern int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:923:2: error: too few arguments to function 'extcon_unregister_notifier'
> >   extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> >   ^
> > In file included from drivers/power/axp288_charger.c:29:0:
> > include/linux/extcon.h:242:12: note: declared here
> >  extern int extcon_unregister_notifier(struct extcon_dev *edev, enum extcon id,
> >             ^
> > 
> > Caused by commit 843735b788a4 ("power: axp288_charger: axp288 charger
> > driver") from the battery tree interacting with commit 046050f6e623
> > ("extcon: Update the prototype of extcon_register_notifier() with enum
> > extcon") from the extcon tree.
> > 
> > I applied this merge fix patch for tday and can carry it as necessary
> > (it is clearly not correct, but it will make it build):
> > 
> > From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Date: Mon, 25 May 2015 21:00:24 +1000
> > Subject: [PATCH] power: axp288_charger: fix for AIP change
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> > ---
> >  drivers/power/axp288_charger.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/power/axp288_charger.c b/drivers/power/axp288_charger.c
> > index 5680317f4823..e4d569f57acc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/power/axp288_charger.c
> > +++ b/drivers/power/axp288_charger.c
> > @@ -848,7 +848,7 @@ static int axp288_charger_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	/* Register for extcon notification */
> >  	INIT_WORK(&info->cable.work, axp288_charger_extcon_evt_worker);
> >  	info->cable.nb.notifier_call = axp288_charger_handle_cable_evt;
> > -	ret = extcon_register_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> > +	ret = extcon_register_notifier(info->cable.edev, EXTCON_NONE, &info->cable.nb);
> >  	if (ret) {
> >  		dev_err(&info->pdev->dev,
> >  			"failed to register extcon notifier %d\n", ret);
> > @@ -909,7 +909,7 @@ intr_reg_failed:
> >  		extcon_unregister_interest(&info->otg.cable);
> >  	power_supply_unregister(info->psy_usb);
> >  psy_reg_failed:
> > -	extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> > +	extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, EXTCON_NONE, &info->cable.nb);
> >  	return ret;
> >  }
> >  
> > @@ -920,7 +920,7 @@ static int axp288_charger_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >  	if (info->otg.cable.edev)
> >  		extcon_unregister_interest(&info->otg.cable);
> >  
> > -	extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, &info->cable.nb);
> > +	extcon_unregister_notifier(info->cable.edev, EXTCON_NONE, &info->cable.nb);
> >  	power_supply_unregister(info->psy_usb);
> >  
> >  	return 0;

I think we are going to have to resolve this when it hits Linus's tree
:(