From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>
Cc: "Thomas Petazzoni" <thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com>,
"Noralf Trønnes" <noralf@tronnes.org>,
"Greg Kroah-Hartman" <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: fix out of bound access
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 20:22:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150608145201.GA15145@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1433483211.2658.22.camel@perches.com>
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 10:46:51PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-06-05 at 10:22 +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 01:48:31PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> []
<snip>
> I looked at it a bit more and there's a macro that calls
> write_register so there are actually many more call sites.
>
> It's a bit non trivial to change the macro as all the
> called (*write_register) functions would need changing
> and these functions use va_list.
>
> Maybe if you _really_ feel like it, but it's a bit of work.
Hi Joe,
I was doing this one today, and just changed write_reg8_bus8 to test.
but when started compiling I found out another variation:
#define write_reg(par, ...) \
par->fbtftops.write_register(par, NUMARGS(__VA_ARGS__), __VA_ARGS__)
and there are only 870 calls to write_reg. :(
I was making it like void write_reg8_bus8(struct fbtft_par *par, int len, int *sbuf)
but if i have to add an integer array to the places where write_reg is called
it will become a big change. Any simple idea?
regards
sudip
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-08 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-04 13:34 [PATCH v2] staging: fbtft: fix out of bound access Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-04 20:48 ` Joe Perches
2015-06-05 4:52 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-05 5:46 ` Joe Perches
2015-06-08 14:52 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-06-08 15:57 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150608145201.GA15145@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=noralf@tronnes.org \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@free-electrons.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.