From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC 1/2] target: Add support for fabric IRQ completion Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 09:27:20 +0200 Message-ID: <20150609072720.GA10758@lst.de> References: <1432281446-31080-1-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> <1432281446-31080-2-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:46281 "EHLO newverein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752106AbbFIH1W (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 03:27:22 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1432281446-31080-2-git-send-email-nab@daterainc.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" Cc: target-devel , linux-scsi , linux-kernel , Christoph Hellwig , Hannes Reinecke , Sagi Grimberg , Nicholas Bellinger > diff --git a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c > index 3fbb0d4..aa08d6b 100644 > --- a/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c > +++ b/drivers/target/target_core_tpg.c > @@ -37,6 +37,7 @@ > > #include > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "target_core_internal.h" This hunk look unrelated. On the implementation: the new target_core_fabric_ops flag and command flag aren't really needed, just add a version of target_complete_cmd that takes the flag. target_complete_irq is fairly misnamed as it doesn't get called just from irq context, please chose a more sensible name for it.