From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932973AbbFIKJJ (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 06:09:09 -0400 Received: from cantor2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:43095 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932175AbbFIKIw (ORCPT ); Tue, 9 Jun 2015 06:08:52 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:08:46 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Huang Rui Cc: Andy Lutomirski , Thomas Gleixner , Peter Zijlstra , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Len Brown , John Stultz , =?utf-8?B?RnLDqWTDqXJpYw==?= Weisbecker , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "x86@kernel.org" , Fengguang Wu , Aaron Lu , "Suthikulpanit, Suravee" , "Li, Tony" , "Xue, Ken" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86, mwaitt: make delay method configurable Message-ID: <20150609100846.GE22105@pd.tnic> References: <1433819621-15093-1-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com> <1433819621-15093-3-git-send-email-ray.huang@amd.com> <20150609090543.GA22105@pd.tnic> <20150609100309.GB17030@hr-slim.amd.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150609100309.GB17030@hr-slim.amd.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 06:03:10PM +0800, Huang Rui wrote: > Sorry, I am suggested to make the mwaitx delay configurable firstly by > our guys... > Why do you think that method is bad? You're seriously asking that?! Think about it. Who do you think will go and put "mwaitx" in her/his kernel command line? What percentage of the users will know that? How are you going to communicate this to all CZ users? What does that kernel parameter bring you that you cannot do in code at boot time? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply. --