From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 7/9] xenalyze: handle more events in sched_process Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 12:44:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20150609104448.GA1004@aepfle.de> References: <1432369458-7587-1-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <1432369458-7587-8-git-send-email-olaf@aepfle.de> <556DE3EF.8090507@eu.citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <556DE3EF.8090507@eu.citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: George Dunlap Cc: Wei Liu , Stefano Stabellini , Ian Jackson , Ian Campbell , xen-devel@lists.xen.org List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Jun 02, George Dunlap wrote: > On 05/23/2015 09:24 AM, Olaf Hering wrote: > > void sched_process(struct pcpu_info *p) > > + fprintf(warn, "%s: event:%x (min:%x sub:%x main:%x)\n", > > + __func__, ri->event, ri->evt.minor, ri->evt.sub, ri->evt.main); > Was there a reason you didn't want to change this to "Unknown event"? I will remove this printf because process_generic already dumps the info. Olaf