From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: EDMA oftree entry for AM335x Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:10:38 -0700 Message-ID: <20150610051037.GA2740@atomide.com> References: <20150504064323.GU15254@pengutronix.de> <20150504141103.GD24469@atomide.com> <5548CB54.1040302@ti.com> <20150505145828.GB21061@atomide.com> <5549F95B.8090905@ti.com> <20150506143951.GG21061@atomide.com> <20150608105957.GT26523@pengutronix.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from muru.com ([72.249.23.125]:56946 "EHLO muru.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750861AbbFJFKl (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 01:10:41 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150608105957.GT26523@pengutronix.de> Sender: linux-omap-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-omap@vger.kernel.org To: Robert Schwebel Cc: Peter Ujfalusi , =?utf-8?Q?Beno=C3=AEt?= Cousson , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org * Robert Schwebel [150608 04:01]: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:39:52AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > That may never happen considering that davinci is using it too.. It's > > best to not count on that happening anytime soon at least. > > So my current understanding is that we have the situation that the > kernel warns about the oftree being wrong, but isn't able to handle an > oftree that would be right. > > Shouldn't the warning being added when the kernel driver supports that > new mechanism? This particular driver is broken and it needs to be fixed properly. > I had a warning free mainline kernel without patches on my customer > hardware before, so this smells a bit like a regression ... :-/ Yes sorry I'm not patching away the warning as it does not fix the driver. Peter, I assume you are busy fixing it? Regards, Tony From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: tony@atomide.com (Tony Lindgren) Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 22:10:38 -0700 Subject: EDMA oftree entry for AM335x In-Reply-To: <20150608105957.GT26523@pengutronix.de> References: <20150504064323.GU15254@pengutronix.de> <20150504141103.GD24469@atomide.com> <5548CB54.1040302@ti.com> <20150505145828.GB21061@atomide.com> <5549F95B.8090905@ti.com> <20150506143951.GG21061@atomide.com> <20150608105957.GT26523@pengutronix.de> Message-ID: <20150610051037.GA2740@atomide.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Robert Schwebel [150608 04:01]: > On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 07:39:52AM -0700, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > > That may never happen considering that davinci is using it too.. It's > > best to not count on that happening anytime soon at least. > > So my current understanding is that we have the situation that the > kernel warns about the oftree being wrong, but isn't able to handle an > oftree that would be right. > > Shouldn't the warning being added when the kernel driver supports that > new mechanism? This particular driver is broken and it needs to be fixed properly. > I had a warning free mainline kernel without patches on my customer > hardware before, so this smells a bit like a regression ... :-/ Yes sorry I'm not patching away the warning as it does not fix the driver. Peter, I assume you are busy fixing it? Regards, Tony