From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from box.christofferholmstedt.se ([188.166.68.52]:47336 "EHLO box.christofferholmstedt.se" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753000AbbFJIY7 (ORCPT ); Wed, 10 Jun 2015 04:24:59 -0400 Received: from authenticated-user (unknown [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by box.christofferholmstedt.se (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7EF42140D6B for ; Wed, 10 Jun 2015 04:24:55 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 10:24:49 +0200 From: Christoffer Holmstedt Subject: nl802154 enum misspelled, just send patch? Message-ID: <20150610082449.GA20831@arazu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-wpan-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: linux-wpan@vger.kernel.org Hi While working on the CCA improvements to wpan-tools I noticed that one of the enums has a value misspelled. As the header is not in UAPI yet I suggest we fix this. NL802154_CCA_UWB_MULTIPEXED is missing an l (ell) in multiplexed. The header file is included in wpan-tools repository and available in the kernel. Should I just send a patch for bluetooth-next and then the new header file is copied over to wpan-tools repository or what is the procedure here? I assume normal procedure for more "stable" user-space software is that the kernel header file(s) should not be included in the user-space tool but instead included and linked against the kernel headers (from running system or similiar source). At the moment the nl802154 header is included in wpan-tools to make it easier to build while developing. So, should I send a patch for both bluetooth-next and wpan-tools or just bluetooth-next? Regards -- Christoffer Holmstedt