From: Martin Jansa <martin.jansa@gmail.com>
To: Paul Eggleton <paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com>
Cc: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] remove neon from oe-core
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 12:03:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150610100353.GA2400@jama> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1554329.HKQRZb0eD9@peggleto-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 10:17:53AM +0100, Paul Eggleton wrote:
> Hi Ross,
>
> On Tuesday 09 June 2015 20:14:15 Burton, Ross wrote:
> > Since Subversion moved away from neon it appears the only user of it in
> > oe-core is GStreamer as a HTTP client plugin. By virtue of being
> > maintained I suspect the libsoup plugin is generally the better choice
> > there, so as neon is now unmaintained upstream (last release September
> > 2014, doesn't work with latest GnuTLS release) I propose moving it to
> > meta-oe.
> >
> > Any comments?
>
> I have to be honest and say I don't like meta-oe continuing to be a dumping
> ground for old things that only a few (or no) people are using - if we must
> keep these recipes around, I'd rather they go into a different layer even if
> that layer's only grouping factor is "legacy items", at least then they are
> labelled appropriately. GStreamer 0.10 and BlueZ 4 were recent examples,
> perhaps I should have spoken up earlier, although I don't necessarily think
> it's too late.
>
> Martin - what do you think?
Yes, meta-legacy not included in my world builds looks much better than
dumping untested changes to meta-oe (both gstreamer-0.10 and bluez-4
dumps didn't even parse in form how they were sent to oe-devel ML).
--
Martin 'JaMa' Jansa jabber: Martin.Jansa@gmail.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-10 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-09 19:14 [RFC] remove neon from oe-core Burton, Ross
2015-06-10 1:41 ` akuster808
2015-06-10 9:17 ` Paul Eggleton
2015-06-10 9:31 ` Burton, Ross
2015-06-10 10:03 ` Martin Jansa [this message]
2015-06-10 10:24 ` Burton, Ross
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150610100353.GA2400@jama \
--to=martin.jansa@gmail.com \
--cc=openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org \
--cc=paul.eggleton@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.