From: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
To: Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@gmail.com>
Cc: <netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <davem@davemloft.net>,
<Kernel-team@fb.com>, Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>,
Ido Shamay <idos@mellanox.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mlx4_en: don't wait for high order page allocation
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 10:11:48 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150612171148.GA3053866@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <557B1166.1050303@gmail.com>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 10:05:42AM -0700, Alexander Duyck wrote:
> On 06/12/2015 09:50 AM, Shaohua Li wrote:
> >High order page allocation can cause direct memory compaction and harm
> >performance. The patch makes the high order page allocation don't wait,
> >so not trigger direct memory compaction with memory pressure. More
> >details can be found in a similar patch for net core:
> >http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=143406665720428&w=2
> >
> >Cc: Amir Vadai <amirv@mellanox.com>
> >Cc: Ido Shamay <idos@mellanox.com>
> >Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@fb.com>
> >---
> > drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> >diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> >index 2a77a6b..9bc4143 100644
> >--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> >+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx4/en_rx.c
> >@@ -60,8 +60,11 @@ static int mlx4_alloc_pages(struct mlx4_en_priv *priv,
> > for (order = MLX4_EN_ALLOC_PREFER_ORDER; ;) {
> > gfp_t gfp = _gfp;
> >- if (order)
> >+ if (order) {
> >+ if ((PAGE_SIZE << (order - 1)) >= frag_info->frag_size)
> >+ gfp &= ~__GFP_WAIT;
> > gfp |= __GFP_COMP | __GFP_NOWARN;
> >+ }
> > page = alloc_pages(gfp, order);
> > if (likely(page))
> > break;
>
> Is this even really necessary? I would thing the fact that the
> refill is done using GFP_ATOMIC would be enough to cover the
> frequently used cases. I wouldn't think the initial allocation when
> the interface is brought up would be something that is a big enough
> deal to justify being fixed in this case.
Ok, if the allocation is always using GFP_ATOMIC at runtime, we
don't need this of course. please ignore it then.
Thanks,
Shaohua
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-12 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 16:50 [PATCH] mlx4_en: don't wait for high order page allocation Shaohua Li
2015-06-12 17:05 ` Alexander Duyck
2015-06-12 17:11 ` Shaohua Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150612171148.GA3053866@devbig257.prn2.facebook.com \
--to=shli@fb.com \
--cc=Kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=alexander.duyck@gmail.com \
--cc=amirv@mellanox.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=idos@mellanox.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.