From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Vikas Shivappa <vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vikas.shivappa@intel.com,
x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de,
mingo@kernel.org, matt.fleming@intel.com, will.auld@intel.com,
linux-rdt@eclists.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 14:48:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615124852.GC3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1434133037-25189-6-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:17:12AM -0700, Vikas Shivappa wrote:
> + /* Additional Intel-defined flags: level 0x00000010 */
> + if (c->cpuid_level >= 0x00000010) {
> + u32 eax, ebx, ecx, edx;
> +
> + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + c->x86_capability[13] = ebx;
> +
> + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_CAT_L3)) {
> +
> + cpuid_count(0x00000010, 1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx);
> + c->x86_rdt_max_closid = edx + 1;
> + c->x86_rdt_max_cbm_len = eax + 1;
> + }
> + }
I'm still annoyed by the whole RDT/CAT thing, so the above reads a CAT
leaf and puts the values in an RDT variable.
That's inconsistent.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 12:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-12 18:17 [PATCH V9 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 01/10] cpumask: Introduce cpumask_any_online_but Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-15 12:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-15 16:48 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-16 8:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-16 19:00 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 02/10] x86/intel_cqm: Modify hot cpu notification handling Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-15 12:38 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-15 16:52 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 03/10] x86/intel_rapl: Modify hot cpu notification handling for RAPL Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 04/10] x86/intel_rdt: Cache Allocation documentation and cgroup usage guide Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-15 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2015-06-15 17:04 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 06/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add new cgroup and Class of service management Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 07/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for cache bit mask management Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 08/10] x86/intel_rdt: Implement scheduling support for Intel RDT Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 09/10] x86/intel_rdt: Hot cpu support for Cache Allocation Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-16 8:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-16 19:01 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-16 19:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-19 20:42 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-12 18:17 ` [PATCH 10/10] x86/intel_rdt: Intel haswell Cache Allocation enumeration Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-15 14:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-15 21:44 ` Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-16 8:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2015-06-16 9:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-06-17 16:23 ` Vikas Shivappa
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-06-23 22:56 [PATCH V10 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-23 22:56 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-05 0:01 [PATCH V8 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-05 0:01 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-03 19:09 [PATCH V8 00/10] New cpumask API and Intel Cache Allocation support Vikas Shivappa
2015-06-03 19:09 ` [PATCH 05/10] x86/intel_rdt: Add support for Cache Allocation detection Vikas Shivappa
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150615124852.GC3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdt@eclists.intel.com \
--cc=matt.fleming@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@intel.com \
--cc=vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com \
--cc=will.auld@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.