From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Tom Yan <tom.ty89@gmail.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: optimal io size / custom alignment
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2015 15:31:54 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150615133154.GV1992@ws.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGnHSE=gtd2WVcxOBoyfqnp3QtT4RHfK356GHastBbiK5mtmFA@mail.gmail.com>
On Sat, Jun 13, 2015 at 10:52:04PM +0800, Tom Yan wrote:
> As I have mentioned in previous mails, I have an sata/usb3 adapter
> which could work in uas mode, and when it does, it has a weird optimal
> i/o size:
>
> Disk /dev/sdb: 74.5 GiB, 80026361856 bytes, 156301488 sectors
> Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
> Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
> I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 33553920 bytes
This is no problem (33553920 % 512 = 0) with the current kernel and
the current util-linux git tree where we support non power of 2
alignment.
> http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-newbie-8/how-to-foramt-2tb-external-hard-drive-4175529792/
>
> In the above link, there shows another similar case of an external
> drive with 4k physical sector.
from the link:
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 4096 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 4096 bytes / 33553920 bytes
this is problem (33553920 % 4096 != 0) and frankly it seems like
pretty strange thing, maybe kernel guys can comment it (CC: to
Martin).
> I am not sure if there's anything wrong with the device(s) or the
> kernel, but anyway I doubt if fdisk should determine alignment with
> this size. As you can calculate, it may not necessarily be a multiple
> of the size of physical sectors, or that of common erase block of SSDs
> (which is not reported anywhere AFAIK).
>
> Perhaps this I/O size does matter on alignment for certain cases, but
> shouldn't physical sector or erase block be at least of higher
> priority when it comes to alignment?
I think we can test "optimal_io_size % physical_sector_size" and use physical
sector size as the granularity if the optimal_io_size is a strange number.
> In any case, it would be nice if fdisk can allow customize alignment
> (like gdisk does), so that users can at least decide how partitions
> should be aligned in weird cases like this. With that, the long-time
> deprecated "dos compatibility" might be able to go as well.
I'll think about it...
Karel
--
Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
http://karelzak.blogspot.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-15 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-13 14:52 optimal io size / custom alignment Tom Yan
2015-06-15 13:31 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2015-06-16 5:20 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 5:37 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 9:43 ` Karel Zak
[not found] ` <20150616094320.GX1992-xkT7n84Rsxv/9pzu0YdTqQ@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-16 10:22 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 10:22 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 17:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <yq1zj3zfuna.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-16 19:26 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 19:26 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-16 21:28 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <yq1d20vfimj.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-17 9:49 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-17 9:49 ` Tom Yan
[not found] ` <CAGnHSEnMgivXU_0gDaOkHFkbc=Ve8PaPR0ho8+VhdcUuNu89Gw-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-18 21:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-18 21:01 ` Martin K. Petersen
[not found] ` <yq1a8vwenog.fsf-+q57XtR/GgMb6DWv4sQWN6xOck334EZe@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-20 16:01 ` Tom Yan
2015-06-20 16:01 ` Tom Yan
[not found] ` <CAGnHSE=DGa24TPox8wp4k264jnXjMOq7kzf-tCRf1eJt9kN0ZQ-JsoAwUIsXosN+BqQ9rBEUg@public.gmane.org>
2015-06-21 0:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-21 0:12 ` Martin K. Petersen
2015-06-22 14:32 ` Alan Stern
2015-06-22 14:32 ` Alan Stern
2015-07-12 4:19 ` optimal io size / custom alignment -- caution on custom aligns Linda Walsh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150615133154.GV1992@ws.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tom.ty89@gmail.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.