From: Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>
To: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com>,
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: drm i915 weirdness with /sys/class/drm/card0*/status
Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 23:28:19 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150616212819.GC28290@gardel-login> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150616113739.GS28462@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com>
On Tue, 16.06.15 12:37, Chris Wilson (chris@chris-wilson.co.uk) wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 01:17:29PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > On Tue, 16.06.15 10:14, Chris Wilson (chris@chris-wilson.co.uk) wrote:
> >
> > > The biggest change here is 4.1 stopped forcing the probe from sysfs
> > > precisely because systemd was hitting them so often for illogical
> > > reasons (being docked depends on having the lid open and an
> > > external display connected!). To force the probe, you must do
> > > $ echo detect > /sys/class/drm/*/status
> >
> > The way people "dock" their laptops these days is apparently that
> > they plug in an external keyboard+mouse and a display, close the lid
> > and stash the laptop away somewhere. logind hence counts the displays
> > connected, and if its >= 2 it doesn't suspend the machine even if the
> > lid is closed. Before logind, GNOME implemented the very same
> > logic. It's hence hardly "illogical", it's just how this works...
>
> Note that a closed lid causes the internal panel to be reported as
> disconnected - it always has (with the exception of a module parameter
> to force otherwise to accommodate broken lid buttons). Using the number
> of connected displays is thus flawed.
Hmm, if I change the algorithm to ignore the eDP and LVDS outputs and
see if any of the others is plugged + enabled should fix this, correct?
Lennart
--
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-16 21:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-15 23:45 drm i915 weirdness with /sys/class/drm/card0*/status Lennart Poettering
2015-06-16 7:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-16 8:12 ` Jani Nikula
2015-06-16 9:14 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 10:25 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-16 11:22 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-06-16 11:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-16 21:25 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-06-17 8:29 ` David Herrmann
2015-06-17 11:11 ` Daniel Vetter
2015-06-17 16:41 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-06-16 21:08 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-06-16 22:39 ` Dave Airlie
2015-06-16 11:17 ` Lennart Poettering
2015-06-16 11:37 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-16 21:28 ` Lennart Poettering [this message]
2015-06-17 7:45 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150616212819.GC28290@gardel-login \
--to=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=daniel.vetter@intel.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jani.nikula@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.