From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43223) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z57jP-0002P0-02 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:25:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z57jL-0002ml-JC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:25:54 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54455) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z57jL-0002k3-CV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 03:25:51 -0400 Received: from int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx09.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.22]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A12EC2BCD6D for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2015 07:25:50 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 09:25:47 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150617092531-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1434480849-23093-1-git-send-email-dgilbert@redhat.com> <87a8vyj079.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> <20150617085742-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <877fr2hkqr.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <877fr2hkqr.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] Migration compatibility for serial List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: amit.shah@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" , quintela@redhat.com On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 09:11:56AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" writes: > > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 08:52:42AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert (git)" writes: > >> > >> > From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > >> > > >> > Older QEMUs dont understand the new (sub)sections that > >> > may be generated in the serial device. Limit their generation > >> > to newer machine types. > >> > >> Please explain briefly what state migration can lose with old machine > >> types, and how this could impact the guest. The commits adding the > >> subsections should have the information[*]. Pointers to them might > >> suffice. > >> > >> > >> [*] Should != do; I didn't check. > > > > OTOH if we have flags named after specific portions we skip, > > and not after qemu versions, this becomes evident from code. > > The commit message needs to spell things out regardless. Sure, thanks for pointing this out.