From: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
To: "Antoine, Peter" <peter.antoine@intel.com>
Cc: "intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org"
<intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"daniel.vetter.intel.com@irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com"
<daniel.vetter.intel.com@irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 16:50:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150618155006.GC29117@strange.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <C182EC90AE29B54BB712270726FAFA75010B0EE6@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com>
On Thu, Jun 18, 2015 at 03:45:44PM +0100, Antoine, Peter wrote:
> Not a blocker. It gets a little more interesting, as the L3CC
> registers are shared across all engines, but is only saved in the RCS
> context. But, it is reset on the context switch when ELSP is set. So
> we would have to program it (i.e. MMIO) and also set it in the batch
> start for the RCS. Each ring would have to have a proper
> init_context() and these registers programmed there.
Hum, so yes, it's like you say. I think leaving a comment somewhere in
the init path telling us we rely on the RCS init_context() for all the
rings would be nice, but that's extra topping that can be done any time.
--
Damien
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-18 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-18 12:29 [PATCH v5] drm/i915 : Added Programming of the MOCS Peter Antoine
2015-06-18 12:59 ` Chris Wilson
2015-06-18 13:50 ` Damien Lespiau
2015-06-18 14:45 ` Antoine, Peter
2015-06-18 15:25 ` Damien Lespiau
2015-06-18 15:35 ` chris
2015-06-18 15:50 ` Damien Lespiau [this message]
2015-06-19 6:34 ` Antoine, Peter
2015-06-22 13:50 ` Daniel Vetter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150618155006.GC29117@strange.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=damien.lespiau@intel.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter.intel.com@irsmsx102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--cc=intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=peter.antoine@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.