From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Peter Karlsson <peter@zapto.se>,
devel@driverdev.osuosl.org, dan.carpenter@oracle.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment)
Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:03:34 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150623053334.GA4416@sudip-PC> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150622133649.GB15439@sudip-PC>
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 07:06:49PM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 03:02:37PM +0200, Peter Karlsson wrote:
> > On 2015-06-22 06:29, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> > > which tree have you been using?
> > > Greg will have three staging tree, use staging-testing
> >
> > I have used linux-next tree :/
> well, I am now confused why linux-next is not having this struct.
> at line 415 of drivers/staging/ft1000/ft1000-usb/ft1000_debug.c
> struct timeval tv; is there in staging-next. And today's linux-next
> has merged staging-next. Then how that struct timeval is not there in
> linux-next ?
I was doing a bisect to see why the files are differing in staging-next
and linux-next. And it turns out to be:
8b37bf430656 ("staging: ft1000: Replace timeval and time_t with time64_t")
which didn't go through the staging tree.
regards
sudip
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-23 5:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-21 11:29 [PATCH v2 0/2] checkpatch fixes Peter Karlsson
2015-06-21 11:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment Peter Karlsson
2015-06-22 11:30 ` Sudip Mukherjee
[not found] ` <20150622122900.GD1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <CADVatmP4mkHFYzmhML6AvKjgPny1bfi2e=n_=WAt6SruaH4zOw@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20150622124625.GE1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <CADVatmNJcjG_o6ro3LnHL8Q6myPfN5PWJ=oNcnFz6XHyjfZHgA@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20150622130237.GF1354@laptop>
[not found] ` <20150622133649.GB15439@sudip-PC>
2015-06-23 5:33 ` Sudip Mukherjee [this message]
2015-06-23 8:05 ` staging patch not in staging tree (was: Re: [PATCH 1/2] staging: ft1000-usb: fixed table alignment) Dan Carpenter
2015-06-23 8:12 ` Sudip Mukherjee
2015-06-21 11:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] staging: ft1000-usb: shorten lines to under 80 characters Peter Karlsson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150623053334.GA4416@sudip-PC \
--to=sudipm.mukherjee@gmail.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter@zapto.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.