Re: [PATCH]: Mux n_gsm: Add a DLCI hangup state and callback

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 05:53:56PM +0200, Gwenn Bourrée wrote:
> 
> Dear kernel tty maintainers,
>  
> Please review the following patch:
> 
> From 6e006bd522124d0e8a2f6075099a21f7051a426f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Gwenn Bourree <gwenn.bourree@intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 17:26:01 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH] Mux n_gsm: Add a DLCI hangup state and callback
> 
> Use of asynchronous hangup instead of vhangup.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gwenn Bourree <gwenn.bourree@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Gwenn Bourree <gwenn.bourree@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Mustapha Ben Zoubeir <mustaphax.ben.zoubeir@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas LOUIS <nicolasx.louis@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ravindran, Arun <arun.ravindran@intel.com
> 
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Same comments on this one, but as you are wanting to send a series of
patches, send a series of patches, each one numbered properly, otherwise
I have no idea what order to apply them in.

greg k-h