From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2015 21:45:14 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150629194514.GC10993@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <55919C0F.7020000@laposte.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55919C0F.7020000@laposte.net> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] Arietta (AT91SAM9G25), strange kernel messages (3.0-rc5) List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Marc Le Douarain Cc: Xenomai@xenomai.org On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 09:27:11PM +0200, Marc Le Douarain wrote: > Hello everybody, > > tested Xenomai 3.0-rc5 on the little Arietta (with patch > ipipe-core-3.18.12-arm-2.patch), > and even if it seems to work (I-pipe registered and latenty test running), > theses lines seeems quite suspect : > > NR_IRQS:16 nr_irqs:16 16 > ------------[ cut here ]------------ > WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 0 at kernel/irq/pm.c:48 > irq_pm_install_action+0x94/0xd0() > Modules linked in: > CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper Not tainted 3.18.12-xeno-mld #1 > [] (unwind_backtrace) from [] (show_stack+0x10/0x14) > [] (show_stack) from [] (warn_slowpath_common+0x60/0x80) > [] (warn_slowpath_common) from [] > (warn_slowpath_null+0x18/0x1c) > [] (warn_slowpath_null) from [] > (irq_pm_install_action+0x94/0xd0) > [] (irq_pm_install_action) from [] > (__setup_irq+0x398/0x4f4) > [] (__setup_irq) from [] > (request_threaded_irq+0xc4/0x124) > [] (request_threaded_irq) from [] > (at91sam926x_pit_common_init+0xcc/0x1a0) > [] (at91sam926x_pit_common_init) from [] > (clocksource_of_init+0x44/0x88) > [] (clocksource_of_init) from [] > (start_kernel+0x240/0x3cc) > [] (start_kernel) from [<20008040>] (0x20008040) > ---[ end trace cb88537fdc8fa200 ]--- Does not the exact same kernel not patched with Xenomai and I-pipe with the exact same configuration, only without CONFIG_IPIPE and CONFIG_XENOMAI, have the same problem? -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org