From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 30 Jun 2015 11:56:14 +0200 From: Gilles Chanteperdrix Message-ID: <20150630095614.GD2038@hermes.click-hack.org> References: <000a01d0b270$6c0e6b70$442b4250$@gmail.com> <20150629202243.GE10993@hermes.click-hack.org> <00c401d0b30b$6bc243d0$4346cb70$@gmail.com> <20150630091018.GC2038@hermes.click-hack.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150630091018.GC2038@hermes.click-hack.org> Subject: Re: [Xenomai] R: Device drivers and networking stack (RTnet) on Xenomai 3 List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Giorgio Buffa Cc: xenomai@xenomai.org On Tue, Jun 30, 2015 at 11:10:18AM +0200, Gilles Chanteperdrix wrote: > 3- upon high packet rate, the Linux kernel moves handling of the > NIC driver interrupts to a kernel thread without a real-time > scheduling policy, so even with PREEMPT_RT it can cause the handling > of the NIC driver to not be real-time. Please disregard the comment about PREEMPT_RT. I am sure the PREEMPT_RT developers have thought about that. -- Gilles. https://click-hack.org