From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
To: Ananth Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@in.ibm.com>,
Anton Arapov <arapov@gmail.com>,
David Long <dave.long@linaro.org>,
Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>, Jan Willeke <willeke@de.ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com>,
Mark Wielaard <mjw@redhat.com>,
Pratyush Anand <panand@redhat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2015 03:22:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150707012250.GA7523@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150707012210.GA7466@redhat.com>
No functional changes, preparation.
Add the new helper, find_next_ret_chain(), which finds the first !chained
entry and returns its ->next. Yes, it is suboptimal. We probably want to
turn ->chained into ->start_of_this_chain pointer and avoid another loop.
But this needs the boring changes in dup_utask(), so lets do this later.
Change the main loop in handle_trampoline() to unwind the stack until ri
is equal to the pointer returned by this new helper.
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index 4c941fe..98e4d97 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1766,11 +1766,22 @@ handle_uretprobe_chain(struct return_instance *ri, struct pt_regs *regs)
up_read(&uprobe->register_rwsem);
}
+static struct return_instance *find_next_ret_chain(struct return_instance *ri)
+{
+ bool chained;
+
+ do {
+ chained = ri->chained;
+ ri = ri->next; /* can't be NULL if chained */
+ } while (chained);
+
+ return ri;
+}
+
static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
{
struct uprobe_task *utask;
- struct return_instance *ri;
- bool chained;
+ struct return_instance *ri, *next;
utask = current->utask;
if (!utask)
@@ -1780,24 +1791,18 @@ static void handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
if (!ri)
goto sigill;
+ next = find_next_ret_chain(ri);
/*
* TODO: we should throw out return_instance's invalidated by
* longjmp(), currently we assume that the probed function always
* returns.
*/
instruction_pointer_set(regs, ri->orig_ret_vaddr);
-
- for (;;) {
+ do {
handle_uretprobe_chain(ri, regs);
-
- chained = ri->chained;
ri = free_ret_instance(ri);
utask->depth--;
-
- if (!chained)
- break;
- BUG_ON(!ri);
- }
+ } while (ri != next);
utask->return_instances = ri;
return;
--
1.5.5.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-07 1:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 1:22 [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 01/11] uprobes: Introduce get_uprobe() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:44 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 02/11] uprobes: Introduce free_ret_instance() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:46 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 03/11] uprobes: Send SIGILL if handle_trampoline() fails Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:51 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 04/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to use uprobe_warn() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:52 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` Oleg Nesterov [this message]
2015-07-07 12:54 ` [PATCH v2 05/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to find the next chain beforehand Anton Arapov
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 06/11] uprobes: Export struct return_instance, introduce arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 12:58 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:52 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:22 ` [PATCH v2 07/11] uprobes/x86: Reimplement arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:02 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:53 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 08/11] uprobes: Change handle_trampoline() to flush the frames invalidated by longjmp() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:05 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 09/11] uprobes: Change prepare_uretprobe() to (try to) flush the dead frames Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:07 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 11:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 10/11] uprobes: Add the "enum rp_check ctx" arg to arch_uretprobe_is_alive() Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:08 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-07 1:23 ` [PATCH v2 11/11] uprobes/x86: Make arch_uretprobe_is_alive(RP_CHECK_CALL) more clever Oleg Nesterov
2015-07-07 13:11 ` Anton Arapov
2015-07-10 12:07 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2015-07-10 12:01 ` [PATCH v2 00/11] uprobes: longjmp fixes Pratyush Anand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150707012250.GA7523@redhat.com \
--to=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=ananth@in.ibm.com \
--cc=arapov@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.long@linaro.org \
--cc=dvlasenk@redhat.com \
--cc=fche@redhat.com \
--cc=jkenisto@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mjw@redhat.com \
--cc=panand@redhat.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willeke@de.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.