From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: blk-mq vs kmemleak Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 01:17:40 -0700 Message-ID: <20150708081740.GA3374@infradead.org> References: <20150703161137.GA10438@codemonkey.org.uk> <5596C080.4050009@sandisk.com> <20150707103323.GA13228@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com> <559BDB49.70209@sandisk.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:43801 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S934296AbbGHIRr (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 04:17:47 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <559BDB49.70209@sandisk.com> Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: Bart Van Assche Cc: Catalin Marinas , Dave Jones , "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 06:59:37AM -0700, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Please note that my test was run with CONFIG_SLUB_DEBUG=y which causes a red > zone to be allocated before and after each block of allocated memory. Could > that explain the kmalloc-96 objects ? 96 is almost guaranteed to be the sense buffer allocated in scsi_init_request and freed in scsi_exit_request.