From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Viresh Kumar Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:20:54 +0530 Message-ID: <20150708105054.GB1805@linux> References: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones-QSEj5FYQhm4dnm+yROfE0A@public.gmane.org> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, kernel-F5mvAk5X5gdBDgjK7y7TUQ@public.gmane.org, rjw-LthD3rsA81gm4RdzfppkhA@public.gmane.org, linux-pm-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, ajitpal.singh-qxv4g6HH51o@public.gmane.org List-Id: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org On 24-06-15, 14:58, Lee Jones wrote: > This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree > and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the > tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the normal way. > > There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily related to CPUFreq, > but are required to get it to work. Anyone who is not interested in general STi > DT changes can safely ignore these. > > v1 => v2: > - CPUFreq is no longer it's own device in DT; instead: > - It is probed from the platform area > - Key properties have been moved into the CPU's node > - Driver is less generic [ST => STI] > - Documentation has been updated > - Point one (above) has been accounted for > - Example of bootloader supplied node has been provided > - GPL licensing has been updated to reflected the header > - Kconfig disparity has been rectified [bool => tristate] Sorry for being so late to get back to this.. Was tooo busy :( -- viresh -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: viresh.kumar@linaro.org (Viresh Kumar) Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:20:54 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality In-Reply-To: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> References: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> Message-ID: <20150708105054.GB1805@linux> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 24-06-15, 14:58, Lee Jones wrote: > This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree > and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the > tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the normal way. > > There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily related to CPUFreq, > but are required to get it to work. Anyone who is not interested in general STi > DT changes can safely ignore these. > > v1 => v2: > - CPUFreq is no longer it's own device in DT; instead: > - It is probed from the platform area > - Key properties have been moved into the CPU's node > - Driver is less generic [ST => STI] > - Documentation has been updated > - Point one (above) has been accounted for > - Example of bootloader supplied node has been provided > - GPL licensing has been updated to reflected the header > - Kconfig disparity has been rectified [bool => tristate] Sorry for being so late to get back to this.. Was tooo busy :( -- viresh From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758680AbbGHKvF (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 06:51:05 -0400 Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com ([209.85.192.182]:33641 "EHLO mail-pd0-f182.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758273AbbGHKvA (ORCPT ); Wed, 8 Jul 2015 06:51:00 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 16:20:54 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Lee Jones Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel@stlinux.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, ajitpal.singh@st.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] cpufreq: Introduce support for ST's cpufreq functionality Message-ID: <20150708105054.GB1805@linux> References: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1435154348-28840-1-git-send-email-lee.jones@linaro.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 24-06-15, 14:58, Lee Jones wrote: > This driver reads very platform specific information in from Device Tree > and translates it into frequency tables. The generic drivers then use the > tables to conduct frequency and voltage scaling in the normal way. > > There are 'ARM' patches in the set which are not necessarily related to CPUFreq, > but are required to get it to work. Anyone who is not interested in general STi > DT changes can safely ignore these. > > v1 => v2: > - CPUFreq is no longer it's own device in DT; instead: > - It is probed from the platform area > - Key properties have been moved into the CPU's node > - Driver is less generic [ST => STI] > - Documentation has been updated > - Point one (above) has been accounted for > - Example of bootloader supplied node has been provided > - GPL licensing has been updated to reflected the header > - Kconfig disparity has been rectified [bool => tristate] Sorry for being so late to get back to this.. Was tooo busy :( -- viresh