From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/4] perf: Add PERF_RECORD_SWITCH to indicate context switches
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2015 11:56:56 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150708145656.GB31332@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <559D28AB.4080201@intel.com>
Em Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 04:42:03PM +0300, Adrian Hunter escreveu:
> On 08/07/15 16:28, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Jul 08, 2015 at 12:52:40AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> >> On Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 01:13:59PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> >>> Em Tue, Jul 07, 2015 at 05:36:14PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra escreveu:
> >> I was just thinking that 2 records, each with a fixed layout would be
> >> easier to parse than 1 record with variable layout.
> >> The record space is immense, so from that point it really doesn't
> >> matter.
> > We could do a land grab at some point there, if/when we find some reason
> > for that... :-)
> >> Do whatever is easiest, less mistakes get made etc. :-)
> >> No real preference either way, as long we we've thought about it.
> > Right, I just don't want to have two u32 carrying -1 for no reason.
> So you'd be OK with 2 RECORD types?
Yeah, no problem.
> I will see what is involved.
Ok.
- Arnaldo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-08 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-07 8:36 [PATCH V3 0/4] perf: Add PERF_RECORD_SWITCH to indicate context switches Adrian Hunter
2015-07-07 8:36 ` [PATCH V3 1/4] " Adrian Hunter
2015-07-07 13:25 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 13:44 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 15:36 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-07 16:13 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 22:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-08 13:28 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-08 13:42 ` Adrian Hunter
2015-07-08 14:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2015-07-07 8:36 ` [PATCH V3 2/4] perf tools: Add new PERF_RECORD_SWITCH event Adrian Hunter
2015-07-07 13:50 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 8:36 ` [PATCH V3 3/4] perf record: Add option --switch-events to select PERF_RECORD_SWITCH events Adrian Hunter
2015-07-07 13:53 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 8:36 ` [PATCH V3 4/4] perf script: Add option --show-switch-events Adrian Hunter
2015-07-07 13:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2015-07-07 9:06 ` [PATCH V3 0/4] perf: Add PERF_RECORD_SWITCH to indicate context switches Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150708145656.GB31332@kernel.org \
--to=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pawel.moll@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.