From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix, from userid 118) id E41F2E009D7; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:36:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on yocto-www.yoctoproject.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-HAM-Report: * -0.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE RBL: Sender listed at http://www.dnswl.org/, no * trust * [178.33.45.107 listed in list.dnswl.org] * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Greylist: delayed 152099 seconds by postgrey-1.32 at yocto-www; Thu, 09 Jul 2015 08:36:43 PDT Received: from 5.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (5.mo1.mail-out.ovh.net [178.33.45.107]) by yocto-www.yoctoproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1AD9E009A7 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 08:36:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail410.ha.ovh.net (gw6.ovh.net [213.251.189.206]) by mo1.mail-out.ovh.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C58611024080 for ; Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:18:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (HELO queueout) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 9 Jul 2015 17:18:58 +0200 Received: from pac33-3-88-170-243-169.fbx.proxad.net (HELO localhost) (eric%eukrea.com@88.170.243.169) by ns0.ovh.net with SMTP; 9 Jul 2015 17:18:57 +0200 Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2015 17:18:54 +0200 From: Eric =?UTF-8?B?QsOpbmFyZA==?= To: Daiane Angolini Message-ID: <20150709171854.4375f53b@eukrea.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: =?UTF-8?B?RXVrcsOpYQ==?= Electromatique X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Ovh-Tracer-Id: 10439625412828179812 X-Ovh-Remote: 88.170.243.169 (pac33-3-88-170-243-169.fbx.proxad.net) X-Ovh-Local: 213.186.33.20 (ns0.ovh.net) X-OVH-SPAMSTATE: OK X-OVH-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-OVH-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekvddrgeejucetufdoteggucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddm X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrfeekvddrgeejucetufdoteggucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuqfggjfenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddm Cc: "meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org" , Otavio Salvador Subject: Re: SOC_FAMILY Rework X-BeenThere: meta-freescale@yoctoproject.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.13 Precedence: list List-Id: Usage and development list for the meta-fsl-* layers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Jul 2015 15:36:45 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Daiane, Le Thu, 9 Jul 2015 11:54:14 -0300, Daiane Angolini a =C3=A9crit : > I'm sorry, Otavio, but you are not re-thinking what we have. I don't > think this list is fine. I don't see why to separate imx5 from imxs. > And, after GCC 5.X is up and linux-imx_2.6.35 is gone, imx5 will be > exactly like a imx3. >=20 Does that mean there is an updated GPU library and full IPU drivers for more recent kernels than 2.6.35 for i.MX53 ? Thanks, Eric