From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ig0-f177.google.com ([209.85.213.177]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZESmq-00075V-Jq for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 01:44:05 +0000 Received: by igvi1 with SMTP id i1so22172641igv.1 for ; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:43:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hash ([2001:470:1d:6db:230:48ff:fe9d:9c89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15sm376981iop.3.2015.07.12.18.43.40 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 12 Jul 2015 18:43:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bob by hash with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZESmL-0003jT-P7 for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:43:33 -0400 Date: Sun, 12 Jul 2015 21:43:33 -0400 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: attempting mesh on ath10k Message-ID: <20150713014333.GA14152@localhost> References: <20150706214921.GF23012@localhost> <20150712142532.GA24495@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150712142532.GA24495@localhost> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: ath10k@lists.infradead.org [trimmed CC to list] On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 10:25:32AM -0400, Bob Copeland wrote: > It looks like unicast self-protected action frames (peering) works fine, but > broadcast multihop action frames (PREQs) never go over the air. Does > this sound familiar to anyone? Actually, it's any group addressed frame. I tried playing with various values for htt_data_tx_ext_tid as well as just using the tid on the frame (in mesh group addressed frames still have a qos header with tid=0). [ 662.170000] XXX htt tx completion msdu_id 0 discard 0 no_ack 0 success 1 [ 662.470000] XXX tx seq: 264 txmode 0 [ 662.470000] XXX htt tx flags0 5 flags1 3136 len 39 id 0 frags_paddr 07337028, msdu_paddr 06513e2e vdev 0 tid 17 freq 0 [ 662.480000] XXX htt tx completion msdu_id 0 discard 0 no_ack 0 success 1 [ 662.600000] XXX tx seq: 265 txmode 0 [ 662.600000] XXX htt tx flags0 5 flags1 2048 len 156 id 0 frags_paddr 07337028, msdu_paddr 06932028 vdev 0 tid 0 freq 0 [ 662.620000] XXX tx seq: 266 txmode 0 [ 662.620000] XXX htt tx flags0 5 flags1 2048 len 116 id 1 frags_paddr 07337000, msdu_paddr 06921028 vdev 0 tid 0 freq 0 [ 662.630000] XXX htt tx completion msdu_id 0 discard 0 no_ack 1 success 0 [ 662.640000] XXX htt tx completion msdu_id 1 discard 0 no_ack 1 success 0 [ 663.090000] XXX tx seq: 267 txmode 0 The 'success 1' ones are unicast, the success 0 are mcast (in this case using the frame's tid, otherwise it would be 16.) Kind of odd that it's not working, since my earlier snapshot worked... I guess at worst I can bisect compat-wireless versions but that will take some time. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k