From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: apmu: silence build warnings
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 08:58:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713085807.GA3886@katana> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436561296-29141-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2488 bytes --]
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:04:06AM +0900, Simon Horman wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:48:16PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > From: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
> >
> > With shmobile_defconfig but SMP=n && SUSPEND=n, I get:
> >
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c:49:12: warning: 'apmu_power_off' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> > arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c:70:12: warning: 'apmu_wrap' defined but not used [-Wunused-function]
> >
> > Annotate those functions like the functions around it.
>
> thanks for noticing this.
>
> I'm not familiar with when it is appropriate to use __maybe_unused but does
> anything speak against using #if as per the conditional compilation of the
> callers in platsmp-apmu.c of the above functions?
I did my approach for consistency reasons. It looked to me that the
*_on/off functions wanted to be grouped at the beginning.
Your approach works but looks fragile to me as soon as the ifdeffery of
the callers change. So, we could move the code into the callers ifdef
block, but we should do this consistently, even for the functions
currently marked __maybe_unused. That would scatter them a little,
though. apmu_wrap needs its own ifdeffery in any case.
Do you have a preference?
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c
> index b0790fc32282..54cf153b570f 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-shmobile/platsmp-apmu.c
> @@ -46,12 +46,14 @@ static int __maybe_unused apmu_power_on(void __iomem *p, int bit)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND)
> static int apmu_power_off(void __iomem *p, int bit)
> {
> /* request Core Standby for next WFI */
> writel_relaxed(3, p + CPUNCR_OFFS(bit));
> return 0;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static int __maybe_unused apmu_power_off_poll(void __iomem *p, int bit)
> {
> @@ -67,12 +69,14 @@ static int __maybe_unused apmu_power_off_poll(void __iomem *p, int bit)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +#if defined(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) || defined(CONFIG_SUSPEND) || defined(CONFIG_SMP)
> static int apmu_wrap(int cpu, int (*fn)(void __iomem *p, int cpu))
> {
> void __iomem *p = apmu_cpus[cpu].iomem;
>
> return p ? fn(p, apmu_cpus[cpu].bit) : -EINVAL;
> }
> +#endif
>
> static void apmu_init_cpu(struct resource *res, int cpu, int bit)
> {
[-- Attachment #2: Digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-13 8:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-10 20:48 [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: apmu: silence build warnings Wolfram Sang
2015-07-13 1:04 ` Simon Horman
2015-07-13 8:58 ` Wolfram Sang [this message]
2015-07-14 7:35 ` Simon Horman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-24 8:41 [GIT PULL] Second Round of Renesas ARM Based SoC Cleanup for v4.3 Simon Horman
2015-07-24 8:41 ` [PATCH] ARM: shmobile: apmu: silence build warnings Simon Horman
2015-07-24 8:41 ` Simon Horman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150713085807.GA3886@katana \
--to=wsa@the-dreams.de \
--cc=linux-sh@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.