From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.80.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1ZEbQr-0002rM-LG for ath10k@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 10:57:58 +0000 Received: by ieik3 with SMTP id k3so19408487iei.3 for ; Mon, 13 Jul 2015 03:57:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 06:57:26 -0400 From: Bob Copeland Subject: Re: attempting mesh on ath10k Message-ID: <20150713105726.GA29238@localhost> References: <20150706214921.GF23012@localhost> <20150712142532.GA24495@localhost> <20150713014333.GA14152@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "ath10k" Errors-To: ath10k-bounces+kvalo=adurom.com@lists.infradead.org To: Michal Kazior Cc: "ath10k@lists.infradead.org" On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 10:13:59AM +0200, Michal Kazior wrote: > > Actually, it's any group addressed frame. I tried playing with various > > values for htt_data_tx_ext_tid as well as just using the tid on the frame > > (in mesh group addressed frames still have a qos header with tid=0). > > Just a quick question: did you try applying the sw crypto/raw mode > patch[1] and using it for mesh? > > [1]: https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/6600721/ Thanks for the pointer, will give it a try. -- Bob Copeland %% http://bobcopeland.com/ _______________________________________________ ath10k mailing list ath10k@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/ath10k