All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mark.rutland@arm.com (Mark Rutland)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2015 15:19:20 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150713141920.GF19083@leverpostej> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1436793967-7138-6-git-send-email-Dave.Martin@arm.com>

On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 02:25:52PM +0100, Dave P Martin wrote:
> The naming of DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK is inconsistent with the way other
> similar macros are named.
> 
> This patch makes the naming more consistent, and appends "64"
> as a reminder that this ESR pattern only matches from AArch64
> state.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>

Looks sane to me, though I think it should probably be merged with the
subsequenty patch moving the definition out to esr.h.

Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>

Mark.

> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |    5 +++--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c                |    4 ++--
>  2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> index ff09058..bb97e9d 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
> @@ -46,8 +46,9 @@
>  /*
>   * ESR values expected for dynamic and compile time BRK instruction
>   */
> -#define DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(x) \
> -	((ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | ESR_ELx_IL | ((x) & 0xffff))
> +#define ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(imm)					\
> +	((ESR_ELx_EC_BRK64 << ESR_ELx_EC_SHIFT) | ESR_ELx_IL |	\
> +	 ((imm) & 0xffff))
>  
>  /*
>   * #imm16 values used for BRK instruction generation
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> index a0d10c5..a5a838e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/kgdb.c
> @@ -235,13 +235,13 @@ static int kgdb_step_brk_fn(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int esr)
>  
>  static struct break_hook kgdb_brkpt_hook = {
>  	.esr_mask	= 0xffffffff,
> -	.esr_val	= DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(KGDB_DYN_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> +	.esr_val	= ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(KGDB_DYN_DBG_BRK_IMM),
>  	.fn		= kgdb_brk_fn
>  };
>  
>  static struct break_hook kgdb_compiled_brkpt_hook = {
>  	.esr_mask	= 0xffffffff,
> -	.esr_val	= DBG_ESR_VAL_BRK(KGDB_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM),
> +	.esr_val	= ESR_ELx_VAL_BRK64(KGDB_COMPILED_DBG_BRK_IMM),
>  	.fn		= kgdb_compiled_brk_fn
>  };
>  
> -- 
> 1.7.10.4
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2015-07-13 14:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-13 13:25 [PATCH v2 00/10] arm64: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number for size of BRK instruction Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:47   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] arm64/debug: Mask off all reserved bits from generated ESR values Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:14   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:22     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] arm64: esr.h type fixes and cleanup Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:54   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] arm64/debug: Eliminate magic number from ESR template definition Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:16   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] arm64/debug: More consistent naming for the BRK ESR template macro Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:19   ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] arm64/debug: Move BRK ESR template macro into <asm/esr.h> Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:18   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] arm64/debug: Simplify BRK insn opcode declarations Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:38   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 08/10] arm64/debug: Add missing #include Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:34   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 14:44     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 14:45       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] arm64/BUG: Use BRK instruction for generic BUG traps Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:43   ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 16:51     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 16:56       ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-13 17:05         ` Dave P Martin
2015-07-14 10:20         ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 11:09           ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 11:34             ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 15:51               ` Mark Rutland
2015-07-14 16:53                 ` Dave Martin
2015-07-14 16:11   ` Catalin Marinas
2015-07-14 16:55     ` Dave Martin
2015-07-13 13:25 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] arm64/BUG: Show explicit backtrace for WARNs Dave Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150713141920.GF19083@leverpostej \
    --to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.