From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 22:17:49 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Message-ID: <20150716201749.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1436929315-28520-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1436929315-28520-4-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1436929315-28520-4-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > @@ -1604,6 +1613,12 @@ static void power_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu) > static void power_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu) > { > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); > + int txn_flags; > + > + txn_flags = cpuhw->txn_flags; > + cpuhw->txn_flags = 0; > + if (cpuhw->txn_flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD) > + return; That seems, unintentional? ;-) From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Peter Zijlstra Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 20:17:49 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/8] perf: Add a flags parameter to pmu txn interfaces Message-Id: <20150716201749.GL3644@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> List-Id: References: <1436929315-28520-1-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1436929315-28520-4-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: <1436929315-28520-4-git-send-email-sukadev@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Sukadev Bhattiprolu Cc: Ingo Molnar , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo , Michael Ellerman , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 08:01:50PM -0700, Sukadev Bhattiprolu wrote: > @@ -1604,6 +1613,12 @@ static void power_pmu_start_txn(struct pmu *pmu) > static void power_pmu_cancel_txn(struct pmu *pmu) > { > struct cpu_hw_events *cpuhw = this_cpu_ptr(&cpu_hw_events); > + int txn_flags; > + > + txn_flags = cpuhw->txn_flags; > + cpuhw->txn_flags = 0; > + if (cpuhw->txn_flags & ~PERF_PMU_TXN_ADD) > + return; That seems, unintentional? ;-)