From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Theodore Ts'o Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 block/for-4.2/writeback] ext4: implement cgroup writeback support Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:37:31 -0400 Message-ID: <20150717013731.GF22531@thunk.org> References: <1434495193-31182-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20150712180520.GE18734@mtj.duckdns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Return-path: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thunk.org; s=ef5046eb; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=cfd7CAG893n80/whbXW/xnMYQ770nH5TloC/Uo6xi1Y=; b=gqPfl4yydjo/uEQQ08uKqvMPZPRLGDKmMDrIduVwwogmBdZ8r4vQz/nzIjf4TX8hDXMgOwyw59gV725xHHW7IQC6n5LTy7UQWXjRSPFi2lT+FvIhfmpINakx5wRR+OpAuDNW19fmvijOhMcOPF2DNciZOFsHKWbA30KhVA5P/yE=; Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150712180520.GE18734-qYNAdHglDFBN0TnZuCh8vA@public.gmane.org> Sender: cgroups-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org List-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tejun Heo Cc: axboe-tSWWG44O7X1aa/9Udqfwiw@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-fsdevel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, lizefan-hv44wF8Li93QT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org, cgroups-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, hannes-druUgvl0LCNAfugRpC6u6w@public.gmane.org, kernel-team-b10kYP2dOMg@public.gmane.org, adilger.kernel-m1MBpc4rdrD3fQ9qLvQP4Q@public.gmane.org, linux-ext4-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:05:20PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:53:11PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > This is v2. The only change from the last take[L] is > > > > * Updated to reflect the earlier MS_CGROUPWB -> SB_I_CGROUPWB change. > > > > This patchset implements cgroup writeback support for ext4, which is > > enabled for writeback and ordered data modes. This patchset contains > > the following two patches. > > Ted, these two patches apply cleanly on top of the current mainline > and thus can be routed either through ext4 or block tree. What do you > think? I'll take them through the ext4 tree. - Ted From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753269AbbGQBho (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:37:44 -0400 Received: from imap.thunk.org ([74.207.234.97]:34064 "EHLO imap.thunk.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752947AbbGQBhm (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:37:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2015 21:37:31 -0400 From: "Theodore Ts'o" To: Tejun Heo Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@fb.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCHSET v2 block/for-4.2/writeback] ext4: implement cgroup writeback support Message-ID: <20150717013731.GF22531@thunk.org> Mail-Followup-To: Theodore Ts'o , Tejun Heo , axboe@kernel.dk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, lizefan@huawei.com, cgroups@vger.kernel.org, hannes@cmpxchg.org, kernel-team@fb.com, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org References: <1434495193-31182-1-git-send-email-tj@kernel.org> <20150712180520.GE18734@mtj.duckdns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150712180520.GE18734@mtj.duckdns.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: tytso@thunk.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on imap.thunk.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jul 12, 2015 at 02:05:20PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 06:53:11PM -0400, Tejun Heo wrote: > > This is v2. The only change from the last take[L] is > > > > * Updated to reflect the earlier MS_CGROUPWB -> SB_I_CGROUPWB change. > > > > This patchset implements cgroup writeback support for ext4, which is > > enabled for writeback and ordered data modes. This patchset contains > > the following two patches. > > Ted, these two patches apply cleanly on top of the current mainline > and thus can be routed either through ext4 or block tree. What do you > think? I'll take them through the ext4 tree. - Ted