From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@suse.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>, Pedro Alves <palves@redhat.com>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
live-patching@vger.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 13/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in aesni-intel_asm.S
Date: Sat, 18 Jul 2015 10:40:02 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150718154002.GA19968@treble.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150718142525.GA30713@nazgul.tnic>
On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 04:25:25PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 18, 2015 at 08:46:55AM -0500, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> > I like the balance, but the "ret" is still non-obvious.
>
> Does it have to be obvious?
I feel that making "ret" obvious is better.
But if somebody messes up and adds a second "ret", I suppose
stackvalidate would warn about the fact that it returned without
restoring the frame pointer. So if there are no other objections, your
suggestion of ENTRY_FRAME and ENDPROC_FRAME is fine with me.
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-18 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 90+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-14 17:14 [PATCH v7 0/4] Compile-time stack validation Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 17:14 ` [PATCH v7 1/4] x86/asm: Frame pointer macro cleanup Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 17:14 ` [PATCH v7 2/4] x86/stackvalidate: Compile-time stack validation Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 20:57 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 21:11 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 21:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 21:30 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 21:56 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-14 22:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-20 16:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2015-07-20 17:50 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-21 8:02 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-21 12:04 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-21 8:42 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2015-07-21 12:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 17:14 ` [PATCH v7 3/4] x86/stackvalidate: Add file and directory ignores Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 17:14 ` [PATCH v7 4/4] x86/stackvalidate: Add ignore macros Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-14 17:25 ` [PATCH v7 0/4] Compile-time stack validation Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-15 10:16 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-15 16:05 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] x86: Proposed fixes for stackvalidate warnings Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 01/21] stackvalidate: Process ignores earlier and add more ignore checks Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 02/21] stackvalidate: Add C version of STACKVALIDATE_IGNORE_INSN Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-18 16:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
[not found] ` <CA+55aFyoO75n-mQBrB_YBLx9yNpAjisFAqkO8+YsphD-xmgY+w@mail.gmail.com>
2015-07-18 16:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 03/21] x86/asm: Add C versions of FRAME and ENDFRAME macros Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 04/21] x86/hweight: Add stack frame dependency for __arch_hweight*() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 17:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-17 17:32 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 5:05 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-18 13:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 14:56 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-18 15:57 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-19 4:12 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22 0:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 4:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-22 4:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 4:45 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 05/21] x86/xen: Add stack frame dependency to hypercall inline asm calls Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 06/21] x86/paravirt: Add stack frame dependency to PVOP " Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 07/21] x86/paravirt: Fix frame pointer usage in PV_CALLEE_SAVE_REGS_THUNK Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 08/21] x86/paravirt: Align paravirt thunk functions at 16-byte boundaries Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 09/21] x86/amd: Set ELF function type for vide() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 10/21] x86/reboot: Add ljmp instructions to stackvalidate whitelist Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 11/21] x86/xen: Add xen_cpuid() and xen_setup_gdt() to stackvalidate whitelists Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 12/21] sched: Add __schedule() to stackvalidate whitelist Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 19:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-17 19:58 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 21:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-17 21:23 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 3:44 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 13/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in aesni-intel_asm.S Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 19:43 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-17 19:44 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 20:37 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 20:39 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 20:44 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 20:46 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 20:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 21:01 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-17 21:10 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 8:42 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-18 13:46 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-18 14:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-18 15:40 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2015-07-18 2:51 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-18 3:56 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-20 7:56 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-20 13:59 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-20 17:21 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-20 18:00 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-22 11:52 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-20 15:30 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-20 16:36 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-20 16:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-20 17:19 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-21 8:00 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-21 12:06 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 14/21] x86/asm/crypto: Move .Lbswap_mask data to .rodata section Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 15/21] x86/asm/crypto: Move jump_table " Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 16/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in clmul_ghash_mul/update() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 17/21] x86/asm/entry: Fix frame pointer usage in thunk functions Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 18/21] x86/asm/acpi: Fix frame pointer usage in do_suspend_lowlevel() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 19/21] x86/asm: Fix frame pointer usage in rwsem functions Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 20/21] x86/asm/efi: Fix frame pointer usage in efi_call() Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 16:47 ` [RFC PATCH 21/21] x86/asm/power: Fix frame pointer usage in hibernate_asm_64.S Josh Poimboeuf
2015-07-17 18:56 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] x86: Proposed fixes for stackvalidate warnings Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-18 3:05 ` Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-07-18 21:02 [RFC PATCH 13/21] x86/asm/crypto: Fix frame pointer usage in aesni-intel_asm.S Gustavo da Silva
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150718154002.GA19968@treble.redhat.com \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=live-patching@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@amacapital.net \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mmarek@suse.cz \
--cc=palves@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.