From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Olaf Hering Subject: Re: [PATCH] unmodified-drivers: tolerate IRQF_DISABLED being undefined Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:07:57 +0200 Message-ID: <20150721070757.GB1728@aepfle.de> References: <556C7F5C020000780007FC1E@mail.emea.novell.com> <1433166990.15036.213.camel@citrix.com> <556C85C9020000780007FC4B@mail.emea.novell.com> <20150721065254.GA32071@aepfle.de> <55AE0AC302000078000937B6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1ZHRem-00081L-4z for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Tue, 21 Jul 2015 07:08:04 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55AE0AC302000078000937B6@prv-mh.provo.novell.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Jan Beulich Cc: xen-devel List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Tue, Jul 21, Jan Beulich wrote: > Taking it to mean "all maintained", that's possible, but since I can't > immediately see the point I'd like to ask for some justification. Us - > SUSE - apparently being the only consumer of that code, and us > not using Xen 4.4 together with Linux 4.1, and our 4.5 trees > already having the backport, I'm having some difficulty > understanding the reason for the request. I run compile tests of all xen-4.x branches against all SUSE releases to spot new errors. But since all the required changes for gcc wont be backported anyway I will just patch also this issues out of my copy. Olaf