From: Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"security@kernel.org" <security@kernel.org>,
X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@oracle.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/x86, x86/ldt: Add a selftest for modify_ldt
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 01:36:53 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721233653.GO1063@1wt.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d9ca450f3114a39e1287138cbbdb89d19ba896e3.1437508486.git.luto@kernel.org>
Hi Andy,
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:59:31PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> This tests general modify_ldt behavior (only writes, so far) as
> well as synchronous updates via IPI. It fails on old kernels.
>
> I called this ldt_gdt because I'll add set_thread_area tests to
> it at some point.
Quick feedback : at two places you have this :
> + } else if (errno == ENOSYS) {
> + printf("[OK]\tmodify_ldt is returned -ENOSYS\n");
=> s/is //
Please add stdlib.h to avoid this warning I'm getting on 32-bit :
ldt_gdt.c:286:4: warning: incompatible implicit declaration of built-in function 'exit' [enabled by default]
And I had to remove xmmintrinsic as suggested by Boris as well.
FWIW here's what I'm getting here on 4.1.2 without CONFIG_X86_16BIT
(where nmi_espfix failed), the output is the same for a 32- and a 64-bit
process :
[OK] LDT entry 0 has AR 0x0040FA00 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 0 has AR 0x00C0FA00 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 1 is invalid
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00C0FA00 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 1 is invalid
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00C0FA00 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00D0FA00 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00D07A00 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00D07200 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00D07000 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00D07400 and limit 0x0000AFFF
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507600 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507E00 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507C00 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507A00 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507800 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507800 and limit 0x0000000A
[RUN] Test fork
[OK] LDT entry 2 has AR 0x00507800 and limit 0x0000000A
[OK] LDT entry 1 is invalid
[OK] Child succeeded
[OK] modify_ldt failure 22
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] modify_ldt rejected 16 bit segment
[OK] LDT entry 0 is invalid
[OK] LDT entry 0 has AR 0x0040F200 and limit 0x00000000
[OK] LDT entry 0 is invalid
[RUN] Cross-CPU LDT invalidation
[FAIL] 5 of 5 iterations failed
Thanks,
Willy
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 23:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-21 19:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86: modify_ldt improvement, test, and config option Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt synchronous Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 21:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-21 21:53 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-21 23:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-21 23:38 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-22 0:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 0:07 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 0:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-22 0:21 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-22 0:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 0:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-22 1:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 1:06 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 2:04 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-22 2:04 ` [Xen-devel] " Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-22 2:13 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 2:13 ` [Xen-devel] " Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 0:49 ` Andrew Cooper
2015-07-22 0:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 2:01 ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-22 2:12 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 2:53 ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-22 4:22 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt optional Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 20:20 ` Sasha Levin
2015-07-21 20:27 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 20:28 ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-21 20:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 20:54 ` Brian Gerst
2015-07-22 6:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-22 6:23 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 6:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-22 18:49 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-22 12:34 ` Willy Tarreau
2015-07-21 19:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/x86, x86/ldt: Add a selftest for modify_ldt Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 22:02 ` Boris Ostrovsky
2015-07-21 22:34 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-21 23:36 ` Willy Tarreau [this message]
2015-07-21 23:40 ` Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150721233653.GO1063@1wt.eu \
--to=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sasha.levin@oracle.com \
--cc=security@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.