From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2015 15:03:20 +0200 Subject: [Buildroot] Analysis of build failures In-Reply-To: <55AF91EA.3080701@zacarias.com.ar> References: <20150722063018.99E6B101957@stock.ovh.net> <20150722094349.424e7a3e@free-electrons.com> <55AF91EA.3080701@zacarias.com.ar> Message-ID: <20150722150320.43874326@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Gustavo, On Wed, 22 Jul 2015 09:51:54 -0300, Gustavo Zacarias wrote: > >> sparc | boost-1.58.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/dd032aa7b387f3ba5b25bffcaf833ba0ea9ba199/ > > > > sparc-linux-g++: error: unrecognized argument in option '-mcpu=c3' > > > > Gustavo, any idea? > > Hi. > C3 sound very much like an x86 cpu (Via), i'll take a peek. Interesting, an x86 -mcpu option used on sparc. Is boost smooking weed? :-) > >> powerpc | host-heimdal-1.6rc2 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a07198b3f7f8029d80863a998814877ec9994c60/ > >> powerpc | host-heimdal-1.6rc2 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/a6d22f80938fa19933940a19664c2354e01a871f/ > >> aarch64 | host-heimdal-1.6rc2 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/cd15555cf90dddacdbf9599313e6e0a118049b38/ > > > > Parallel build problem. We'll make host-heimdal build with $(MAKE1) in > > the mean time. Gustavo, can you submit a patch to this effect? > > Ok, seems the sanest until upstream fixes the issues. I agree. > >> powerpc | iproute2-4.1.1 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/5c15e180973425a742629e9e8d0a56e1913d8c03/ > > > > Smell very much like a too old kernel headers problem. Gustavo? > > Possible, though you know i generally hate those powerpc toolchains :) > I think it's time to kill them. I know you hate them. But I like them for one thing: they force us to keep testing with older kernel headers. Look at Luca Ceresoli, who is stuck with a 2.6.30 kernel. > >> powerpc | libsigrok-fe473123ba836445d... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/f02e721e1812d03b5990884aa8f8ff09dd88272c/ > >> powerpc | libsigrok-fe473123ba836445d... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/bf17b998dcdb81f37776765ca200e0e5c344bada/ > >> powerpc | libsigrok-fe473123ba836445d... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/1b38f55602c7aff2afae6f2588e0a8f04b80b09d/ > >> powerpc | libsigrok-fe473123ba836445d... | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/b7d703cf97345463af373217fb90e076bb3dbeb6/ > > > > Compiler too old. Maybe exclude the toolchain for now? > > Ditto above, at this point i don't think these will benefit anyone. Well, C11 is really new. Anyone using gcc 4.7 will hit these problems I believe, not only these oldish PowerPC toolchains. > >> arm | netperf-2.6.0 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/077714a0ee67057abcff680b244228a409243bbf/ > > > > Smells like a GCC 5.x issue: > > > > nettest_omni.o: In function `send_omni_inner': > > nettest_omni.c:(.text+0x5688): undefined reference to `demo_interval_tick' > > There's a new release, worth trying a bump. Right. Will you try this? > >> i686 | openssh-6.9p1 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/dce0202e039f4636d68532c4aab8738938b76650/ > > > > Weird build issues. Gustavo? > > Seems like the portability layer is playing games, on a static build, > that looks like it's triggering it, i'll investigate. Great, thanks! > >> arm | webkit-1.11.5 | NOK | http://autobuild.buildroot.net/results/c7fc621245351eb31afab1b96d3f1f2e6ad0bfad/ > > > > checking for GLES2/gl2.h... yes > > checking whether to use OpenGL ES 2 support... configure: error: Cannot enable OpenGL ES 2 support without EGL > > package/pkg-generic.mk:146: recipe for target '/home/buildroot/build/instance-0/output/build/webkit-1.11.5/.stamp_configured' failed > > make: *** [/home/buildroot/build/instance-0/output/build/webkit-1.11.5/.stamp_configured] Error 1 > > make: Leaving directory '/home/buildroot/build/instance-0/buildroot' > > > > Bernd, Gustavo? > > I think the way forward is upgrading, there's no point in trying to fix > such an old version full of security bugs. > I've got a minimal dep fix as pointed by Yann on the latest version of > the webkitgtk24 package, i was waiting on more (any!) feedback from the > bunch of users wanting a newer/working webkitgtk/midori but they've been > dissapointing to say the least. Fully agreed. I'm planning on merging your webkit work soonish. It should definitely be in 2015.08 IMO. Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com