diff for duplicates of <20150724000001.642.84690@quantum> diff --git a/a/1.txt b/N1/1.txt index e9338c8..aace4dc 100644 --- a/a/1.txt +++ b/N1/1.txt @@ -1,22 +1,17 @@ Quoting Maxime Ripard (2015-05-23 00:49:30) > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:35:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > > Hi, -> > = - +> > > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Maxime Ripard > > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote: -> > > Some clocks are using a factor component, however, unlike their mux, = -gate +> > > Some clocks are using a factor component, however, unlike their mux, gate > > > or divider counterpart, these factors don't have a basic clock > > > implementation. -> > = - +> > > > I think "multiplier" would be a better name here, considering it is the -> > counterpart of "divider". "factor" implies you can multiply and/or divi= -de +> > counterpart of "divider". "factor" implies you can multiply and/or divide > > the clock rate. -> = - +> > You're probably right, I didn't though of it that way :) I also prefer multiplier over factor. @@ -37,19 +32,14 @@ any now, but I wanted to be clear). Regards, Mike -> = - +> > > Unless of course you plan to add that? :) -> = - +> > Hmmm, no, not really. -> = - +> > Maxime -> = - -> -- = - +> +> -- > Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons > Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering > http://free-electrons.com diff --git a/a/content_digest b/N1/content_digest index 962a23c..71e6f17 100644 --- a/a/content_digest +++ b/N1/content_digest @@ -2,38 +2,26 @@ "ref\01432241646-9511-2-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com\0" "ref\0CAGb2v64rqRC24wPWz5xYZv=w2QAtsCb-pd76Qynkb5NBCptXhQ@mail.gmail.com\0" "ref\020150523074930.GI8557@lukather\0" - "From\0Michael Turquette <mturquette@linaro.org>\0" - "Subject\0Re: [PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a basic factor clock\0" + "From\0mturquette@linaro.org (Michael Turquette)\0" + "Subject\0[PATCH v2 1/7] clk: Add a basic factor clock\0" "Date\0Thu, 23 Jul 2015 17:00:01 -0700\0" - "To\0Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com>" - " Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@csie.org>\0" - "Cc\0Stephen Boyd <sboyd@codeaurora.org>" - Emilio Lopez <emilio@elopez.com.ar> - Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> - linux-clk <linux-clk@vger.kernel.org> - linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org> - " Jim Quinlan <jim2101024@gmail.com>\0" + "To\0linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org\0" "\00:1\0" "b\0" "Quoting Maxime Ripard (2015-05-23 00:49:30)\n" "> On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 12:35:35PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:\n" "> > Hi,\n" - "> > =\n" - "\n" + "> > \n" "> > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Maxime Ripard\n" "> > <maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> wrote:\n" - "> > > Some clocks are using a factor component, however, unlike their mux, =\n" - "gate\n" + "> > > Some clocks are using a factor component, however, unlike their mux, gate\n" "> > > or divider counterpart, these factors don't have a basic clock\n" "> > > implementation.\n" - "> > =\n" - "\n" + "> > \n" "> > I think \"multiplier\" would be a better name here, considering it is the\n" - "> > counterpart of \"divider\". \"factor\" implies you can multiply and/or divi=\n" - "de\n" + "> > counterpart of \"divider\". \"factor\" implies you can multiply and/or divide\n" "> > the clock rate.\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> You're probably right, I didn't though of it that way :)\n" "\n" "I also prefer multiplier over factor.\n" @@ -54,21 +42,16 @@ "Regards,\n" "Mike\n" "\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> > Unless of course you plan to add that? :)\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> Hmmm, no, not really.\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" "> Maxime\n" - "> =\n" - "\n" - "> -- =\n" - "\n" + "> \n" + "> -- \n" "> Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons\n" "> Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering\n" > http://free-electrons.com -4b99e7daa24fcfb55344457bf4657144530b3a25bbae6b53726cad5ea433bdb1 +82b8f2a6d987ff7f9b321596535d077e917bcac73ef9500c888b41bbde3dd22b
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.