From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smptin.nadir.org (smtpin.nadir.org [217.114.68.218]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.server123.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:12:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smptin.nadir.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C649E614C for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:03:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smptin.nadir.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtpin-na.nadir.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TQ6Ddb6Eh0qD for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:03:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snail.zeromail.org (mail.zeromail.org [217.114.68.185]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smptin.nadir.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29924E6147 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:03:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1])ng TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by snail.zeromail.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D80A6BFEF2 for ; Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:03:06 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2015 19:02:59 +0200 From: ilf Message-ID: <20150726170259.GC16353@zeromail.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6" Content-Disposition: inline Subject: [dm-crypt] persistent naming: add ID in addition to UUID List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: dm-crypt@saout.de --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cryptsetup currently allows "LUKS UUID in the format UUID=3D.=20 Translation to real device name uses symlinks in /dev/disk/by-uuid=20 directory", as quoted from man/cryptsetup.8. Is there a reason why other persistent block device naming schemes are=20 not supported? I for one would love to use by-id, "a unique name=20 depending on the hardware serial number":=20 https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Persistent_block_device_naming#by-id_a= nd_by-path I am aware of the difference addressing hardware and LUKS header, but in=20 my use case, I actually *do* want to address hardware in crypttab at al. Thanks, and keep up the good work! --=20 ilf =C3=9Cber 80 Millionen Deutsche benutzen keine Konsole. Klick dich nicht we= g! -- Eine Initiative des Bundesamtes f=C3=BCr Tastaturbenutzung --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVtRLDAAoJEBU/45iCHIOUOdgQAL2WoEkGW0LDYS6JE+MJeXFo BilhKCFE/br0MKkwvzWciJB4BPY2OXuq3rfDAv72YKz7N/iT6V/iKh/sCMVcGZR4 E4NAB4DVzt2MzSYoPv2YtBcAV1Y993QwbZyjXzXHBSVQBhcAnCq8iKXrGRlU6ESw stai+Gbe1MctzIiOQgz1g0AZpN9D+9y3ItTojCJgtO33CP9B+dwFCe4DM3Jbe3/O IBSUHhsHBQ/0/G0C+tOJK/B+yyztMJm4x/dV0aYEzsClrQDA3BexYNK/gB3m826J tzfsUB9YVDm5JM0BH7WH+Sj7Y2Pj3e1vMkzGsPEeIQFWZhKc/Ij60Da10AdB8tlX Fx3s13MqkhecifRpFyn5rLt/OVUgQyqHs6XqURo58X9NhOE1/Xfg9bdoFRgTpZlu Ssv+5kMpqUlEOmfSqkrbG2PkuevSkJ1tZOd4q1K/i9ehco1KAlaFKrI+PyZsrO2c bZ8CXbvYj5bTjHKBy40hUQzikvm9zh1UKJr0qpHYfzlLHTQm2pEBqPizPKbs/qp4 GxgrSBEYa+XEdLta0Vr3ZaY0KVm0dWy72nKZwUCWSUUDADaBGMgWQ3RggtGiiMiu GXTkXcT/6Bjp4g7dZZ91ppSn25PzKh71jznbDJjO+U1HPXUSYg2UuvGmD+NCLfxB cqKT7iE0Sgr8v5jE06BC =nMyY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ZoaI/ZTpAVc4A5k6--