All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com>
To: Cong Wang <cwang@twopensource.com>
Cc: netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 20:50:02 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150727185002.GA20334@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHA+R7PzsOCR-UmJ+73jXJaacc_adz9F3-Qs4zB0cSFajpJREw@mail.gmail.com>

On (07/27/15 11:37), Cong Wang wrote:
> 
> dlm uses a kernel TCP socket too, but it allocates a new socket and calls
> ->accept() by itself. ;)

sure, and rds does this in rds_tcp_accept_one() too.

But the newsk being created in sk_clone_lock  is the one on an 
incoming syn, i.e., the one that is saved up as part of listen backlog, 
to be returned later on the accept.

I dont know the details of dlm- can you have one dlm instance per
network namespace? That's where I'm running into this issue- when we
try to have one rds listen socket per netns, and want to be able to
do both
- dynamically build/tear down new network namepsaces, without 
  unloading rds_tcp globally
- unload rds_tcp globally withouth tearing down individual netns.

But perhaps we digress.

Fundamental issue remains: newsk is the syn_recv version of the
listen socket. If the listen socket is a "kernel" socket (kern == 1
for sk_alloc, and the listen socket thus has no sk_net_refcnt),
the syn_recv socket must also have that behavior, so that it is
cleaned up in the same way.

--Sowmini

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-27 18:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-27 14:21 netns refcnt leak for kernel accept sock Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 17:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2015-07-27 17:57   ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 18:13 ` Cong Wang
2015-07-27 18:19   ` Sowmini Varadhan
2015-07-27 18:37     ` Cong Wang
2015-07-27 18:50       ` Sowmini Varadhan [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150727185002.GA20334@oracle.com \
    --to=sowmini.varadhan@oracle.com \
    --cc=cwang@twopensource.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.