From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list linux-mips); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:31:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1]:33587 "EHLO linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by eddie.linux-mips.org with ESMTP id S27008738AbbG1IbPa1x3P (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:31:15 +0200 Received: from scotty.linux-mips.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.1/8.14.8) with ESMTP id t6S8VEmU022411; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:31:14 +0200 Received: (from ralf@localhost) by scotty.linux-mips.net (8.15.1/8.15.1/Submit) id t6S8VDEa022410; Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:31:13 +0200 Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2015 10:31:13 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Paul Burton Cc: Guenter Roeck , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org Subject: Re: Crash in -next due to 'MIPS: Move FP usage checks into protected_{save, restore}_fp_context' Message-ID: <20150728083113.GD30938@linux-mips.org> References: <20150715160918.GA27653@roeck-us.net> <20150727150652.GA1756@roeck-us.net> <20150727172142.GE7289@NP-P-BURTON> <20150727174622.GA10708@roeck-us.net> <20150727180442.GG7289@NP-P-BURTON> <20150727194401.GC14674@roeck-us.net> <20150727200214.GH7289@NP-P-BURTON> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150727200214.GH7289@NP-P-BURTON> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Return-Path: X-Envelope-To: <"|/home/ecartis/ecartis -s linux-mips"> (uid 0) X-Orcpt: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org Original-Recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org X-archive-position: 48477 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org Errors-to: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org X-original-sender: ralf@linux-mips.org Precedence: bulk List-help: List-unsubscribe: List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: linux-mips X-List-ID: linux-mips List-subscribe: List-owner: List-post: List-archive: X-list: linux-mips On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 01:02:14PM -0700, Paul Burton wrote: > Ralf: can you update the patches in -next please? Done. Will push in a few minutes to upstream-sfr; should make it to -next by tomorrow. But could you next time please send a patchset based on something halfway recent? Five patches had merge conflicts, one is already upstream. . Ralf