All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>
Cc: Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Replace explicit function pointer types with rcu_callback_t and call_rcu_func_t
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2015 07:55:32 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150729145532.GI3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438147779-24978-1-git-send-email-boqun.feng@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 01:29:37PM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> Commit ("rcu: Create a synchronize_rcu_mult()") in linux-rcu.git#rcu/next
> branch has introduced rcu_callback_t as the type for rcu callback
> functions and call_rcu_func_t has been introduced for a while. This patch
> series uses the rcu_callback_t and call_rcu_func_t to save a few lines of
> code.
> 
> This patchset is based on rcu/next branch of Paul's linux-rcu tree, and
> consists of two patches:
> 
> 1.	Use rcu_callback_t as the type of callbacks in call_rcu*() and
> 	friends
> 
> 2.	Use call_rcu_func_t to replace the equivalent but complicated
> 	function pointer type.
> 
> Besides cleaning up the code, this patchset can also help code tag program,
> such as cscope to generate a better database.
> 
> This patchset has been already tested by 0day.

Hello, Boqun,

I have queued these for local testing.

							Thanx, Paul

> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h | 10 +++++-----
>  include/linux/rcutiny.h  |  2 +-
>  include/linux/rcutree.h  |  2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c  |  6 +++---
>  kernel/rcu/srcu.c        |  2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/tiny.c        |  8 ++++----
>  kernel/rcu/tree.c        |  8 ++++----
>  kernel/rcu/tree.h        |  5 ++---
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h |  2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/update.c      |  2 +-
>  10 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.4.6
> 


      parent reply	other threads:[~2015-07-29 14:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29  5:29 [PATCH 0/2] Replace explicit function pointer types with rcu_callback_t and call_rcu_func_t Boqun Feng
2015-07-29  5:29 ` [PATCH 1/2] rcu: Use rcu_callback_t in call_rcu*() and friends Boqun Feng
2015-07-29  5:29 ` [PATCH 2/2] rcu: Use call_rcu_func_to to replace explicit type equivalents Boqun Feng
2015-07-29 14:55 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150729145532.GI3717@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.