From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: register syscall numbers for x86 32bit and x86-64 64bit Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:31:30 +0200 Message-ID: <20150731083130.GA24624@gmail.com> References: <1438270467-13324-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438270467-13324-1-git-send-email-aarcange-H+wXaHxf7aLQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-api-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , "\\\"H. Peter Anvin\\\"" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-api-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Andy Lutomirski , Eric B Munson , Pavel Emelyanov , "\\\"Dr. David Alan Gilbert\\\"" , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra List-Id: linux-api@vger.kernel.org * Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This registers the official numbers of the userfaultfd syscall for x86 > 32bit and x86-64 64bit. This registration allows to ship kernels in > production using these two syscall numbers for userfaultfd. > > Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov > Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli > --- > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + > kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+) Hm, is there consensus on the upstream desirability of this sytem call? Thanks, Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752430AbbGaIbj (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:31:39 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f169.google.com ([209.85.212.169]:36063 "EHLO mail-wi0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751648AbbGaIbg (ORCPT ); Fri, 31 Jul 2015 04:31:36 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:31:30 +0200 From: Ingo Molnar To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Ingo Molnar , "\\\"H. Peter Anvin\\\"" , Peter Zijlstra , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Andy Lutomirski , Eric B Munson , Pavel Emelyanov , "\\\"Dr. David Alan Gilbert\\\"" , Linus Torvalds , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH] userfaultfd: register syscall numbers for x86 32bit and x86-64 64bit Message-ID: <20150731083130.GA24624@gmail.com> References: <1438270467-13324-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438270467-13324-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org * Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This registers the official numbers of the userfaultfd syscall for x86 > 32bit and x86-64 64bit. This registration allows to ship kernels in > production using these two syscall numbers for userfaultfd. > > Acked-by: Pavel Emelyanov > Signed-off-by: Andrea Arcangeli > --- > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + > arch/x86/entry/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + > include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + > kernel/sys_ni.c | 1 + > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+) Hm, is there consensus on the upstream desirability of this sytem call? Thanks, Ingo