All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	linux@arm.linux.org.uk, ralf@linux-mips.org,
	egtvedt@samfundet.no, michael@amarulasolutions.com,
	cmetcalf@ezchip.com
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch()
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 10:51:34 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731085134.GA6751@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150730095011.GD25159@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>


* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > There were only a few architectures utilizing finish_arch_switch() and it looks
> > like they can all do without.
> > 
> > This means we can remove finish_arch_switch(); partly to make up for
> > introducing finish_arch_post_lock_switch(), partly to reduce the number of arch
> > hooks to consider.
> > 
> > Much thanks to Ralf, Will and Chris for helping out with this!
> 
> So the mips patch is already in Ralf's mips-next tree, which means I
> have to wait for that to his Linus' tree before I can commit the last
> patch in this series.
> 
> It also means that all the other patches can go through their respective
> arch tree.
> 
> So anybody who feels so inclined, go ahead, I'll check after the next
> merge window and commit everything that's left -- unless there's
> objections of course :-)

Sounds sensible to me!

Thanks,

	Ingo

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-29 19:08 [RFC][PATCH 0/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 1/7] arm: Remove finish_arch_switch Peter Zijlstra
2015-08-04  7:39   ` Ingo Molnar
2015-08-04  8:26     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2015-08-04  8:32       ` Will Deacon
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 2/7] MIPS: Get rid of finish_arch_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 3/7] avr32: Remove finish_arch_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30  5:40   ` Hans-Christian Egtvedt
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 4/7] score: " Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 5/7] sh: Fold finish_arch_switch() into switch_to() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 6/7] Remove finish_arch_switch Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-29 19:08 ` [RFC][PATCH 7/7] sched: Remove finish_arch_switch() Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-30  9:50 ` [RFC][PATCH 0/7] " Peter Zijlstra
2015-07-31  8:51   ` Ingo Molnar [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150731085134.GA6751@gmail.com \
    --to=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=cmetcalf@ezchip.com \
    --cc=egtvedt@samfundet.no \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux@arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=michael@amarulasolutions.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ralf@linux-mips.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.