From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:20:09 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Maxime Ripard , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Lezcano , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sebastian Reichel , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Thomas Gleixner , Wim Van Sebroeck Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/23] ARM: at91: Properly handle slow clock Message-ID: <20150731102009.GH27985@piout.net> References: <1438335599-3301-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> List-ID: Hi, On 31/07/2015 at 11:59:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote : > I would have squashed commit 5 to 14 into a single patch, but apart > from that it looks good to me. > I wanted to clearly list were the slow clock was needed for each soc. It actually allowed me to find one that was missing. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.free-electrons.com (down.free-electrons.com. [37.187.137.238]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTP id ec7si122797wib.3.2015.07.31.03.20.10 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 03:20:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:20:09 +0200 From: Alexandre Belloni To: Boris Brezillon Cc: Nicolas Ferre , Maxime Ripard , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Alessandro Zummo , Arnd Bergmann , Daniel Lezcano , Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov , Greg Kroah-Hartman , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org, Michael Turquette , rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Sebastian Reichel , Stephen Boyd , Thierry Reding , Thomas Gleixner , Wim Van Sebroeck Subject: [rtc-linux] Re: [PATCH 00/23] ARM: at91: Properly handle slow clock Message-ID: <20150731102009.GH27985@piout.net> References: <1438335599-3301-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 In-Reply-To: <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> Reply-To: rtc-linux@googlegroups.com List-ID: List-Post: , List-Help: , List-Archive: , List-Unsubscribe: , Hi, On 31/07/2015 at 11:59:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote : > I would have squashed commit 5 to 14 into a single patch, but apart > from that it looks good to me. > I wanted to clearly list were the slow clock was needed for each soc. It actually allowed me to find one that was missing. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to "rtc-linux". Membership options at http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux . Please read http://groups.google.com/group/rtc-linux/web/checklist before submitting a driver. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "rtc-linux" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rtc-linux+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com (Alexandre Belloni) Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 12:20:09 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 00/23] ARM: at91: Properly handle slow clock In-Reply-To: <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> References: <1438335599-3301-1-git-send-email-alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com> <20150731115903.4ef23e83@bbrezillon> Message-ID: <20150731102009.GH27985@piout.net> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi, On 31/07/2015 at 11:59:03 +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote : > I would have squashed commit 5 to 14 into a single patch, but apart > from that it looks good to me. > I wanted to clearly list were the slow clock was needed for each soc. It actually allowed me to find one that was missing. -- Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com