All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Fernando Seiti Furusato <ferseiti@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com, 793495@bugs.debian.org,
	Breno Leitao <brenohl@br.ibm.com>,
	Daniel Bast <daniel.bast@gmx.net>
Subject: Re: Bug#793495: xfsprogs fails to build on debian ppc64el
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:58:19 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150804225819.GV16638@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55C0D916.1010102@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 12:24:06PM -0300, Fernando Seiti Furusato wrote:
> Hi Dave.
> 
> I have just noticed that for config.guess and config.sub to be updated, no
> autoreconf or dh_autotools-dev is needed, because of how Makefile was made.
> 
> In Makefile, @row 80:
> 
>  LIBTOOLIZE_INSTALL = `libtoolize -n -i >/dev/null 2>/dev/null && echo -i`
> 
>  configure:
>          libtoolize -c $(LIBTOOLIZE_INSTALL) -f
>          cp include/install-sh .
>          aclocal -I m4
>          autoconf
> 
> This runs libtoolize -c -i which updates those files.
> 
> The file debian/rules runs `make default`, which at some point calls the target
> above (`make configure`). But the file configure already exists, so it does not
> run.

Right. Intentionally so.

....

> diff -Nru xfsprogs-3.2.4/Makefile xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/Makefile
> --- xfsprogs-3.2.4/Makefile	2013-10-10 17:07:16.000000000 -0400
> +++ xfsprogs-3.2.4ppc64el1/Makefile	2015-08-04 11:06:40.000000000 -0400
> @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
>  	$(Q)$(MAKE) $(MAKEOPTS) -C $* install-qa
>  
>  distclean: clean
> -	$(Q)rm -f $(LDIRT)
> +	$(Q)rm -f $(LDIRT) $(CONFIGURE)
>  
>  realclean: distclean
>  	$(Q)rm -f $(CONFIGURE) .gitcensus

That makes distclean do the same thing that realclean does and, as
that commit I pointed out previously, has been intentionally
separated in the build system. You could make the debian/rules file
simply call 'make realclean' rather than 'make distclean' to acheive
this without changing the main makefile. Either way, however, I
don't think that's the problem.

Darrick Wong noted on #xfs that his builds of xfsprogs on ppc64el
from a tarball don't fail at all. His libtool chain is:

>       host-triplet:     powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu
>       libtoolize:       (GNU libtool) 2.4.2 Debian-2.4.2-1.7ubuntu1
>       automake:         automake (GNU automake) 1.14.1
>       autoconf:         autoconf (GNU Autoconf) 2.69

Which is similar to mine, but libtoolize is slightly older (and I'm
on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu). It turns out that the reason the build
works on his machines is that someone had made a small manual change
to /usr/share/aclocal/libtool.m4:

--- a/libtool.m4       2014-02-11 04:58:49.000000000 -0800
+++ b/libtool.m4  2015-07-31 13:48:23.375432372 -0700
@@ -1312,7 +1312,7 @@
   rm -rf conftest*
   ;;

-x86_64-*kfreebsd*-gnu|x86_64-*linux*|powerpc*-*linux*| \
+x86_64-*kfreebsd*-gnu|x86_64-*linux*|ppc*-*linux*|powerpc*-*linux*| \
 s390*-*linux*|s390*-*tpf*|sparc*-*linux*)
   # Find out which ABI we are using.
   echo 'int i;' > conftest.$ac_ext

i.e. the problem looks to be that the libtool package shipped in
debian/unstable does not support ppc64el correctly....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-08-04 22:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 15:21 xfsprogs fails to build on debian ppc64el Daniel Bast
2015-07-31 21:57 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-01 22:52   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-02 13:06     ` Bug#793495: " Daniel Bast
2015-08-02 22:13       ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-04 15:24         ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-04 22:58           ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2015-08-05 13:00             ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-05 13:47               ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-05 15:52                 ` Fernando Seiti Furusato
2015-08-06  0:21                   ` Dave Chinner
2015-08-06  7:10                     ` Nathan Scott

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150804225819.GV16638@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=793495@bugs.debian.org \
    --cc=brenohl@br.ibm.com \
    --cc=daniel.bast@gmx.net \
    --cc=ferseiti@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.