From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Cc: X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Brian Gerst <brgerst@gmail.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, Willy Tarreau <w@1wt.eu>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make then NMI-safe
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:59:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150805085957.GA23893@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <040374ca9800988a0ed35ea9ddeb4a762c1371fa.1437690860.git.luto@kernel.org>
* Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org> wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
> @@ -280,6 +280,10 @@ __switch_to(struct task_struct *prev_p, struct task_struct *next_p)
> unsigned fsindex, gsindex;
> fpu_switch_t fpu_switch;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY
> + WARN_ON(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
> +#endif
Please introduce a less noisy (to the eyes) version of this, something like:
WARN_ON_DEBUG_ENTRY(this_cpu_read(irq_count));
or so, similar to WARN_ON_FPU().
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-05 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-23 22:37 [PATCH 0/3] x86_64: Make int3 non-magical Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/entry/64: Refactor IRQ stacks and make then NMI-safe Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 6:08 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 10:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-24 18:02 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 4:16 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 4:28 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 4:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 4:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 8:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-25 17:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-07-25 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-25 18:12 ` Linus Torvalds
2015-08-05 8:59 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2015-08-05 18:24 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-05 18:27 ` Steven Rostedt
2015-08-05 18:32 ` Andy Lutomirski
2015-08-22 13:55 ` Ingo Molnar
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry/64: Teach idtentry to use the IRQ stack Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-23 22:37 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/entry/64: Move #BP from IST to " Andy Lutomirski
2015-07-24 11:02 ` Borislav Petkov
2015-07-23 22:39 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86_64: Make int3 non-magical Andy Lutomirski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150805085957.GA23893@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=w@1wt.eu \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.