From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Darren Hart Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] acer-wmi: No rfkill on HP wifi Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:54:21 -0700 Message-ID: <20150805205421.GA38348@vmdeb7> References: <1429824979.3169.58.camel@mentor.com> <1438556369.2931.153.camel@mentor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:35264 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752806AbbHEUxn (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:53:43 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438556369.2931.153.camel@mentor.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: "Powell, Michael" Cc: "jlee@suse.com" , "platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org" On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 10:59:29PM +0000, Powell, Michael wrote: > Prevents acer-wmi from blocking wifi on HP Omen 15 laptops Wow, you managed to miss both my automated scans for patches that fail to Cc the maintainer :-) Patchwork caught it though. Please Cc the maintainer listed in MAINTAINERS in the future per Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 5. > > Signed-off-by: Michael Powell > --- > drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c > b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c > index 3ac29a1..3ad8077 100644 > --- a/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c > +++ b/drivers/platform/x86/acer-wmi.c > @@ -807,6 +807,7 @@ static const struct acpi_device_id norfkill_ids[] > __initconst = { > { "IBM0068", 0}, > { "LEN0068", 0}, > { "SNY5001", 0}, /* sony-laptop in charge */ > + { "HPQ6001", 0}, > { "", 0}, > }; I haven't determined the reason yet, but when saving this to apply, I get an encoded blob of text instead of the patch. How did you send this email? -- Darren Hart Intel Open Source Technology Center